-
-
Originally posted by xtreyier:
This is a surgical battle that only moderates, who claim they denounce such brutal slayings done in their religion's name, will have to courageously fight. We are, afterall, despite our differences, the same race - the free human race.
You do understand that Muslim moderates don't dance with bloody murdering Zio-Nazi Orientalist fuckers right?
Stop jacking off and go enlist. Last I heard they need more people to fight in Afghanistan.
-
-
-
Indeed, Islam is a satanic religion that brainwashes all its adherents to commit senseless acts of violence in the name of establishing a worldwide fascist caliphate that will destroy the foundations of civilization and return mankind to the stone age where we will all becomes slaves of the mullahs.
We really need to burn the Koran, bomb the Kaabah and round up all people of the muslim faith. Best thing we can do is to gas them all but at least we should make them wear special identification so that we can restrict their movements and limit their breeding.
I believe the amount of collateral damage can be limited because most muslims will renounce their faith if this were to occur and they will become peace-loving Christians, Buddhists of just agnostics, even better aitheist. This is the power of violence, it can turn evil moon-worshiping satanist terrorist animals to peace loving aitheist peasants who willingly tend the food production and service industries for their loving elite masters. Why if the Israelis can do it to the Palestinians, why can't we do it to our own muslim neighbours.
With a UN mandate and copious amounts of newly minted dollars, I'm sure this Great Project, can be realised with minimum fuss coming from these weak (but nevertheless terroristic) muslims. After all, with the victory of the Coalition Of The Willing in Iraq and Afghanistan, do policy makers really need to think twice? Just think of all the MONEY we can earn from saving the world from Islam!
-
-
-
Conflating Islam and terrorism is a popular theme now amongst Zionist sympathizers but it is not a new phenomenon. Not at all. The orientalist argument have been used to justify what can be succinctly called "Imperialism" since colonial days and Imperialist forces have been guilty of nurturing radical fringe groups to use as either ideological or political boogeyman or victims since the days of British India. The same Ahmadiyya movement (headquartered in London) and other fringe muslim gnostic groups have in the past been guilty of anti-independance propaganda, preaching to adherents that life was meaningless and it was better to continue being British subjects are now being used to foster terrorism, preaching that life was meaningless and to kill innocents is divine. Looking at the ideological, political and financial base of radicalisation movements, we see distinct Western support of a dualistic worldview both based fundamentally on the same Orientalist perspective. One being the so-called bad cop the "new Islamic terror ideology" and the other being the so called good cop the "patriotic Islamophobia ideology". Both serve essentially to justify continued Zionist support, weaken internal national security and destabilize competitors to the sick Western dominance agenda. All acts of terrorism serve a political goal, who benefits in the final analysis will always be an important point to analyze. Abu Nidal, long the poster child of Palestinian terrorism, is now known to have been (he's dead now) under the employ of Mossad but back when it was popular to lambast Palestinian national aspiration as being akin to terrorism, acts of Palestinian terrorism was always blamed on Arafat, the PLO and the Palestinian national liberation movement. Same tactics are being used.
Edited by frakfrakfrak 03 Dec `08, 9:13AM
-
-
-
The problem with Huntington's theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orientalism_(book)#Overview
Prominent European Anti-Muslim and Pro-Hindutva Ideologue
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koenraad_Elst <- Guess who pays his bills
Criticism of Hindutva ideology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindutva#Criticism_.26_allegations_of_fascism
RSS, Hindutva Movement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh
Hindu Taliban
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_Taliban
Bajrang Dal, militant wing of RSS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bajrang_Dal#Controversies
Bharatiya Janata Party support of violence and terrorism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bharatiya_Janata_Party#Controversies_and_criticism
Sangh Parivar, RSS umbrella group, includes BJP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sangh_Parivar#Controversy_and_criticism
BJP involvement in Christian massacres
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Christian_violence_in_India
BJP involvement in Gujarat Muslim massacres
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Gujarat_violence#Criminal_prosecutions
RSS false-flag operation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Samjhauta_Express_bombings#Later_developments
RSS plant in Indian Intelligence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prasad_Shrikant_Purohit
RSS controller
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragya_Singh_Thakur
-
-
-
24 May 2008
Congress Party on path to peace with Pakistan.
http://news.indiamart.com/news-analysis/manmohan-singh-pledg-3027.html
5 November 2008
Indian Lt Colonel Srikant Purohit arrested for staging terrorist attacks
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/big-conspiracy-going-on-to-destabilise-india-centre/381812/
21 November 2008
Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad chief Hemant Karkare has evidence of Hindu terrorism.
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/we-have-evidence-may-arrest-more-ats-chief/78646-3.html
21 November 2008
Indian PM Manmohan Singh comments on arrest of Hindu terrorists.
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_asiapacific/view/391318/1/.html
27 November 2008
Hemant Karkare killed.
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/ats-chief-hemant-karkare-2-officers-killed/79133-3.html
28 November 2008
India's political leadership to blame: Wall Street Journal
http://in.news.yahoo.com/43/20081128/890/twl-india-s-political-leadership-to-blam.html
Engineering crisis
http://eldib.wordpress.com/category/afghanistan/
The Lavon Affair: Isreal's perchant for False-Flag operations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair
-
-
-
Good evening Hitler youths. I do agree with you that Muslims are evil bastards out to deny everybody in the world the pleasure of eating swine meat. That's why there is a conspiracy to make every eating place halal. This of course must be stopped. I suggest we round up all the Muslims, march them to the beaches and machine gun them. Who is with me? Please leave contact number and I will get my secretary to give you a call.
-
-
-
Why would Singapore even need a leader of historic proportions? Singapore just needs someone who can step on the necks on anyone who rocks the boat. We have a good thing here in Singapore and it wasn't by saying excuse me and giving seats to old ladies that we got to where we are today. Why do you think there is a cult-of-Hitler here in Singapore?
http://archive.japantoday.com/jp/news/342042
-
-
-
Actually this is not surprising at all and the recent airing of the race issue dovetails nicely with the agenda of preparing the Chinese majority for an election. Expect to see more subtle hints being dropped in the media on how race, religion and cultural superiority impacts on good governance and investor confidence in the run up to any impending election. The PAP contribution to maintaining Chinese majority dominance cannot be allowed to be forgotten by the electorate. Furthermore, the organisational machinery of the Opposition is still not up to par yet so why wait for them to get better. Beat them when they're weak and keep them demoralised.
Now is really the best time for an election. If the PAP continues to maintain a majority, they will have the mandate to rule for 5 more years which is probably enough to weather out a tough global economic climate. When things pick up, the PAP can point to their good leadership during trying times. That's the kind of credit that's very good to have going forward. If the PAP puts off an election now, things may still be gloomy when they have to call for an election and that at the very least puts the PAP majority under unnecessary risk. Also, a PAP win now will secure their mandate and silence opposition towards any tough measure implemented after the election.
-
-
-
Are SAF military officers, esp. regulars, subjected to any code of conduct when dealing with civilians? Also, are there any regular psychological checks for officers to ensure that the long term responsibilities that they hold do not make them into walking time bombs?
I ask because I have seen on 2 seperate occasions, a SAF major behaving in a loutish manner in public towards civilians. I know this because on one occasion he was in uniform. Suffice to say that, at the very least, this is indicative that the person in question is not well equipped for "normal" life. I also remember from my NSF days that there are often a few regulars who get a bit fucked up after a number of years in service. This is especially worrying if the person is a key office holder. Is there any discreet way for a concerned citizen to bring up this matter without jeopardizing the career of the officer in question?
-
-
-
U.S Senate House Judiciary committee begins proceedings to assess whether President George W. Bush Jr should be tried for murder for the ILLEGAL INVASION OF IRAQ.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDAFozFn4kU
MSNBC reports that Rupert Murdoch's FoxNews has been exposed as being a propaganda mouthpiece of the Neocon conspiracy, transmitting White House talking points as "facts".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-OpIXfXKO8
Rupert Murdoch owns News Corporation, the world's largest media company.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_Corporation
List of assets owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_News_CorporationNote: Includes Dow Jones & Company
Edited by frakfrakfrak 28 Jul `08, 7:42AM
-
-
-
Are my views extremist? Am I anti-West? Does Nazi-inspired Islamophobic Judeo Fascist Zionism constitute the sum of "The West", "Modern civilization", "Universal Human Rights" and "Indelible Freedoms"? Please if my view that "Zionist and Neoconservative inspired false flag operations and black propaganda based on faulty intelligence, lies, deception, and corrupt practises that are seeking to marginalize the international muslim majority and justify their colonization and genocide resulting in the global suffering for ALL men, women and children on planet Earth" are what constitutes "TERRORISM" then please have the same people who constantly print articles in the newspapers than allude to such a thing come out and print that in bold headlines, so that we all know where we stand in the checkerboard world of Zionist ideological fantasy that every two bit hack is foistering in every two bit rag just for a bone and a pat on the head. But, if my claim is true, then I think people should take responsibility for all the lies they've told just to sniff the ass of the prevailing direction of the prancer's fart. Highly placed people who continue to show cowardice and a lack of critical thought even after all the evidence is laid out have the makings of a Pol Pot and endanger everyone by their everyday actions.
Edited by frakfrakfrak 13 Jul `08, 8:55AM
-
-
-
The mainstream argument is that Islam is a terrorist religion adhered to by psychotic murderous infanticidal child-fucking people and so they would inevitably nuke Israel, the fount of Western Civilization and Morality, because they're all simply crazy. That's why its now legal to wiretap everyone on the planet (U.S. Senate passes wiretapping bill), put anyone into internment camps without due process (suspension of Habeus corpus) and wage war on any nation (You're with Us or Against Us).
The argument is (1) All peoples professing the Islamic faith are inherently and fundamentally violent (2) This justifies all suppressive actions against everything Islamic, from the Nation State, to Islamic influenced minaret architecture down to the Individual (3) Muslims are all terrorists, anyone who doesn't think so is a sympathizer.
This viewpoint is lacking in historical and scientific basis. It is based on pseudo-scientific propaganda. Actions premised on this viewpoint has proven to be disastrous.
The reason this viewpoint is advanced is because Israel is engaged in an ideologically driven cold war (via illegal Palestinian internment and illegal settlement expansions) for territorial expansion in the Middle East and Israeli interests entrenched in the White House are promoting a larger policy of long term colonization of the Middle East. The result being higher fuel and food prices for the World and concentration of Money and Power in Zionist hands.
The important questions I think is
1) Is it possible to sell out the interests of Muslims here and somehow profit from that?
2) Can anyone profess Judaism and become a citizen of Israel?
3) Does becoming a card carrying Zionist enable me to have better job prospects?
4) How many muslims does one need to kill while serving in the IDF to "show one's of faith"?
5) Can I get a position as a writer on some mainstream paper if I portray myself as an Anti-Islamic Patriot?
6) If I promise to suppress Muslims everywhere can I get at least to a position of substantial wealth?
7) If I print a few articles in the local newspaper smearing muslims and making Islam "unfashionable" can I at least get invited to parties at the swanky American Club?
8) Does anyone like my curry puffs?
-
-
-
It is a well known fact that *some* Town Councils are preceived by residents as being "useless". These TCs have problems dealing with contractors and enforcing standards. Problems include (a) bad management of contractors assigned to carry out regular maintenance activities (b) rules pertaining to cleanliness and safety are ignored because of ineffective enforcement.
Why are these TCs so problematic while other TCs are not? Personally, I think that within these problematic TCs are certain key people who are well entrenched but lack serious motivation in ensuring the areas under their charge are well taken care off. Residents can see their insincerity when contractors are seen painting the graffiti and soot covered void deck pillars just immediate before an MP visit while the rest of the time, even the drains are choked full of rubbish. Since resident complaints must filter up from TCs, these entrenched interests stay entrenched. Perhaps in kilat TCs, there are alternative feedback loops that maintain TC efficiency but these systems are not in place in all TCs, or they have been compromised.Edited by frakfrakfrak 08 Jul `08, 8:16AM
-
-
-
I edited by previous post to make it more cogent.
We need to cut down on our dependence on oil for electricity. The first thing we can do is cut our electricity usage because at this point in time, even a little bit of savings goes a long way. While campaigns and levies have mainly been targeted at the common people, actually there is still a lot of slack that can be trimmed in the private and public sectors. What we need is some focused effort and thinking to tackle the immediate problem of reducing electricity wastage in common shared surrounding where such wastage usually happens. Making saving electricity a part of the general Go Green agenda I feel is not an efficient method to address the problem. The Green agenda while laudable is a global issue that cannot be immediately solved. The problem of cutting oil dependency is a matter that can be resolved if we treat it the same way we treat the water dependency issue. Fair standards must be set and incentives, not only levies are imposed. In this way the people can be mobilized effectively. Otherwise its all just for show and that would be really shameful.Edited by frakfrakfrak 03 Jul `08, 9:27AM
-
-
-
Iraq was attacked on the false premise that it was responsible for 9/11. The neocon agenda which were prep'ed and ready to go in the event of an widely anticipated 9/11 event took full advantage of that terrorist attack to launch its "full spectrum war" on the world in the guise of the War On Terror, in order to extend the claws of its imperialistic ambitions in knocking down all other engines of growth in the world other than the U.S and dominating the economic levers of money and power with military might. Today, the world still bears the bleeding wounds of those ravenous claws in the form of skyrocketing oil and food prices. Funding for destabilization of Middle Eastern and Asian rivals to the Washington Consensus still flows strong even today. Also strong, is the U.S. support for terrorism.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JG02Ak03.html
What is most intriguing is how, the American people, in the face of a looming economic meltdown (brought on by their own failed military policies) can continue to spend what little is left of the goodwill of the world (the American economy after all is heavily in debt) and blindly and dumbly continue to sacrifice their future and the lives of their loved ones for the sake of Eretz Israel.
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/origin.html
Edited by frakfrakfrak 02 Jul `08, 6:50AM
-
-
-
I have not yet been able to find a single reliable instance in the books of Arab
history where a girl as young as nine years old was given away in marriage.
Unless such examples are given, we do not have any reasonable grounds to believe
that it really was an accepted norm.
The age of Ayesha (ra) has been grossly misreported in the narratives of the
incident.
Most of these narratives are reported only by Hisham ibn `urwah reporting on the
authority of his father. An event as well known as the one being reported,
should logically have been reported by more people than just one, two or three.
It is quite strange that no one from Medinah, where Hisham ibn `urwah lived the
first seventy-one years of his life has narrated the event, even though in
Medinah his pupils included people as well known as Malik ibn Anas. All the
narratives of this event have been reported by narrators from Iraq, where Hisham
is reported to have shifted after living in Medinah for seventy-one years.
Tehzeeb al-Tehzeeb, one of the most well known books on the life and reliability
of the narrators of the traditions ascribed to the Prophet (pbuh) reports that
according to Yaqub ibn Shaibah: "narratives reported by Hisham are reliable
except those that are reported through the people of Iraq". It further states
that Malik ibn Anas objected on those narratives of Hisham, which were reported
through people of Iraq (Vol. 11, pg. 48 - 51).
Meezaan al-Ai`tidaal, another book on the narrators of the traditions of the
Prophet (pbuh) reports that when he was old, Hisham's memory suffered quite
badly (Vol. 4, pg. 301 - 302).
According to the generally accepted tradition, Ayesha (ra) was born about eight
years before Hijrah. However, according to another narrative in Bukhari (Kitaab
al-Tafseer) Ayesha (ra) is reported to have said that at the time Surah Al-
Qamar, the 54th chapter of the Qur'an , was revealed, "I was a young girl". The
54th Surah of the Qur'an was revealed nine years before Hijrah. According to
this tradition, Ayesha (ra) had not only been born before the revelation of the
referred Surah, but was actually a young girl (jariyah), not even only an infant
(sibyah) at that time. Obviously, if this narrative is held to be true, it is in
clear contradiction with the narratives reported by Hisham ibn `urwah. I see
absolutely no reason that after the comments of the experts on the narratives of
Hisham ibn `urwah, why should we not accept this narrative to be more accurate.
According to a number of narratives, Ayesha (ra) accompanied the Muslims in the
battle of Badr and Uhud. Furthermore, it is also reported in books of hadith and
history that no one under the age of 15 years was allowed to take part in the
battle of Uhud. All the boys below 15 years of age were sent back. Ayesha's (ra)
participation in the battle of Badr and Uhud clearly indicates that she was not
nine or ten years old at that time. After all, women used to accompany men to
the battlefields to help them, not to be a burden upon them.
According to almost all the historians Asma (ra), the elder sister of Ayesha
(ra) was ten years older than Ayesha (ra). It is reported in Taqreeb al-Tehzeeb
as well as Al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah that Asma (ra) died in the 73rd year after
hijrah[2] when she was 100 years old. Now, obviously if Asma (ra) was 100 years
old in the 73rd year after hijrah, she should have been 27 or 28 years old at
the time of hijrah. If Asma (ra) was 27 or 28 years old at the time of hijrah,
Ayesha (ra) should have been 17 or 18 years old at that time. Thus, Ayesha (ra)
- if she got married in 1 AH (after hijrah) or 2 AH - was between 18 to 20 years
old at the time of her marriage.
Tabari in his treatise on Islamic history, while mentioning Abu Bakr (ra)
reports that Abu Bakr had four children and all four were born during the
Jahiliyyah - the pre Islamic period. Obviously, if Ayesha (ra) was born in the
period of jahiliyyah, she could not have been less than 14 years in 1 AH - the
time she most likely got married.
According to Ibn Hisham, the historian, Ayesha (ra) accepted Islam quite some
time before Umar ibn Khattab (ra). This shows that Ayesha (ra) accepted Islam
during the first year of Islam. While, if the narrative of Ayesha's (ra)
marriage at seven years of age is held to be true, Ayesha (ra) should not even
have been born during the first year of Islam.
Tabari has also reported that at the time Abu Bakr (ra) planned on migrating to
Habshah (8 years before Hijrah), he went to Mut`am - with whose son Ayesha (ra)
was engaged at that time - and asked him to take Ayesha (ra) in his house as his
son's wife. Mut`am refused, because Abu Bakr had embraced Islam. Subsequently,
his son divorced Ayesha (ra). Now, if Ayesha (ra) was only seven years old at
the time of her marriage, she could not have been born at the time Abu Bakr
decided on migrating to Habshah. On the basis of this report it seems only
reasonable to assume that Ayesha (ra) had not only been born 8 years before
hijrah, but was also a young lady, quite prepared for marriage.
According to a narrative reported by Ahmad ibn Hanbal, after the death of
Khadijah (ra), when Khaulah (ra) came to the Prophet (pbuh) advising him to
marry again, the Prophet (pbuh) asked her regarding the choices she had in her
mind. Khaulah said: "You can marry a virgin (bikr) or a woman who has already
been married (thayyib)". When the Prophet (pbuh) asked about who the virgin was,
Khaulah proposed Ayesha's (ra) name. All those who know the Arabic language, are
aware that the word "bikr" in the Arabic language is not used for an immature
nine-year old girl. The correct word for a young playful girl, as stated earlier
is "Jariyah". "Bikr" on the other hand, is used for an unmarried lady, and
obviously a nine year old is not a "lady".
According to Ibn Hajar, Fatimah (ra) was five years older than Ayesha (ra).
Fatimah (ra) is reported to have been born when the Prophet (pbuh) was 35 years
old. Thus, even if this information is taken to be correct, Ayesha (ra) could by
no means be less than 14 years old at the time of hijrah, and 15 or 16 years old
at the time of her marriage.
-
-
-
Hmm, the microwave treatment was intended to quickly nuke the meat before cooking it until its well done on a pan but you kind of did it the other way around. By what you said if 25sec is all it takes to get all the juices out then I dunno how you can get a "safe" medium rare streak. Perhaps if you marinate in some spices first? Come to think of it I think the reason why we cook everything on fire and use all sorts of tangy spices is because our ancestors ate alot of bad meat.
-
-
-
All these rich fellas when they got problem can get so many doctors say they got chemical imbalance la, stress la etc etc so they can get off easy.
I know got one retarded fella go around sniffing armpit walao got no doctor say mentally incompetent la, chemical imbalance la or what. Just kena 11 years prison and multiple rotan.
So I think moral of the story is the rich people dare to oppress the weaker people in society because they know their money can buy their innocence (or migitate their guilt) in a court of law. So far I think the formula is working what.
-
-
-
Aiya, don't microwave until the meat become carbon la. Just maybe a few seconds and then pan fry until well done if you're cooking a steak. If making curry or what then I think not much problem because all those spices and the long cooking will probably kill a live cow too. Best of course, get good meat, not those American meat than no other country (except Japan) wants to import.
-

