Originally posted by £ Ĭ €ڰ:

He is a visionary who is capable to delivering what he said, that is what seperate a doer from a wanker and talker

 

You have a mentality like a North Korean citizen.

Transcript confirms Yeong's dishonesty

Dear Madam Yeong,

The court transcript which you produced after being pressed has confirmed your dishonesty.

You wrote in your letter to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ): "Having lost [the case], Dr. Chee in open court then called the Singapore leaders 'murderers, robbers, child molesters' and 'rapists.'"

You cleverly omitted the phrase that I had said to Mr Davinder Singh: "...you might as well throw it in..." (see below). By doing so you hide the fact that I was referring to Mr Singh's wild conclusions, and that since he was making all these allegations, he might as well throw in these terms.

This is a far cry from me saying that the Lees committed murder, robbery, rape and had molested children.

Your letter was not even a case of taking my words out of context, it was a wholesale twist of imputing to me something I was not saying. It is childish, unbecoming and a gross lack of intellectual decency.

In the audio-recording there was laughter in the courtroom after I told Mr Singh that he might as well throw in murderers, robbers, child molesters and rapists. (See below) You again omitted this portion in your letter to the WSJ to make it look like I have gone off the deep-end to call the Lees these names.

I also wrote in my letter to the WSJ: “Mdm Yeong also says that 'Singapore upholds free speech.' Yes, and Mr Mugabe has just been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.” By the standard of your logic, you will no doubt say that I have claimed that the brutal Zimbabwean dictator is indeed a Nobel Peace Laureate.

Every time you make such wild claims, including your boss Mr Lee Kuan Yew calling me a psychopath, you degrade yourselves and the offices you hold.

On another matter, Mr Lee testified in court that the International Bar Association (IBA) president had sent a letter to the Law Society of Singapore (LSS) complimenting Singapore on its judiciary. The IBA denies sending the letter and the LSS confirms that it has not received such one.

Would you ask Mr Lee to produce the letter to refute the two organisations? This is important as it was part of the evidence that Mr Lee tendered in court under oath.

By the way you have still not answered why, as a civil servant, you are writing letters for the Minister Mentor when this is his personal matter and not a state one?

Chee Soon Juan
Secretary-General
Singapore Democratic Party

 

Yeong Yoon Yin's letter to Today

Your report "Nothing to do with political freedom" (3 July 2008) refers to my letter to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and to Dr Chee Soon Juan's response published on his website.

In my letter to the WSJ, I said that in the recent defamation cases, Dr Chee had called Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew 'murderers, robbers, child molesters' and 'rapists' in open court.

Dr Chee alleged that I had lied, and challenged me to produce the relevant transcript.

I enclose p. 115 of the verbatim court reporting transcript of the hearing on28 May 2008. Line 11 onwards reads:

Mr Davinder Singh: " ... And to conclude on Dr Chee's submissions, he says that he doesn't wish Mr Lee Kuan Yew and Mr Lee Hsien Loong ill. In that same breath, he says he stands by The New Democrat article, which alleged that they are 'criminals, corrupt, and covered up matters in the NKF'. And under his breath he's now just said 'murderers and robbers'."

Dr Chee: "And rapists, too, you might as well throw it in, you know, right? Child molesters". [SDP: This was followed by laughter in the courtroom.]

Mr Singh: "And this is the man who says "I don't wish them ill".

Dr Chee has once again lied to Singaporeans.

Yeoong Yoon Ying
Press Secretary to Minister Mentor

(SDP:Today completely ignored Dr Chee's letter to the WSJ and only published Mdm Yeong's response.)

http://www.yoursdp.org/index.php/component/content/article/1-singapore/

Sue by who, sue for what?

Singapore Democrats interview with activist Jaslyn Go
03 July 2008

“I will not live by fear”: Activist, businesswoman, mother

What prompts a young mother of two to stand up for her rights and the rights of her fellow citizens in a country known for crushing dissent with frightening efficiency? This is a question that many Singaporeans will ask if they met Jaslyn Go Hui Leng.

This is because Ms Go is one of the 18 Singaporeans charged with taking part in an assembly and procession without a permit on 15 Mar this year.

That event launched the Tak Boleh Tahan! campaign which is aimed at highlighting the PAP Government’s raising of prices and fees that has thrown hundreds of thousands of Singaporeans into economic disarray and hardship.

And what will be her answer?

“I will not live by the fear the PAP seeks to instill in its citizens,” explains Ms Go. “They can try to cripple me with arrest, jail or fine, but they can’t stop me from speaking up.”

So what does the financial plight of workers have to do with a successful businesswoman who leads a more-than-comfortable lifestyle with her family?

“I used to be very poor when I was young,” explained Ms Go, “now that I am better off, I hope I can do my part and highlight the plight our elderly and poor in Singapore are going through.”

“If we continue to allow the PAP to rule with an iron fist, the people’s problems will not be addressed and I fear that the younger generation will suffer more than we are now as the cost of living are skyrocketing and our jobs are being taken over by foreigners.”

The Singapore Democrats first came to know Ms Go during the vigil outside the Burmese embassy in September 2007. Since then, the vivacious and determined advocate of democracy has been actively helping to promote human rights in Singapore.

“Prior to the protest, I tried in my own ways to engage the government by writing to my MP, Tanjong Pagar GRC MPs, and the Straits Times. But time and again they refused to reply to me, or publish my letters,” she writes in her blog.

There is a steely quality about Ms Go that pushes her on. And it is not just starry-eyed ideals that propels the lady’s actions; she makes no bones that she is also doing this for the sake of her two children, aged 3 and 5.

Children in Singapore have been deprived of quality life which is so stressful even for young children, she points out.

“Child suicide has been on the rise. The root of the problem lies in the stiff competition that our children are being put through in school,” says Ms Go. “I hope this can be a thing of the past.”

Asked what she hopes for in the next 5 to 10 years, Ms Go replies that she would like to see elderly folks who have contributed to Singapore’s progress be taken care of by the government and not reduced to collecting cardboard boxes and empty drink cans to eke out a living.

And how does she think this can be achieved?

“I hope to see a change in government to a more humane one that puts the country and the citizens first.”

Ms Go will appear in Subordinate Court 23 together with the other 17 activists.

Many Singaporeans shy away from engaging in the public process by claiming that they have their families to think about. Such fear is a damning indictment of the PAP. Be that as it may, Ms Go’s example and courage should be a ringing call to citizens of this country to overcome their fearful inertia and become actively involved in matters that concern their everyday lives as well as their future.

Singaporeans can get involved by taking the first step next Friday, 11 Jul 08. Come down to the Subordinate Courts at 9 am to lend your support to this woman of incredible courage as well as to the other activists who have stood up for justice and democracy in Singapore.

If Singapore had more committed citizens like Ms Go, this country would be a much better place to live in.

 

http://www.sgpolitics.net/?p=283

I hope Lee Kuan Yew is not that shameless a bastard as to lie saying that IBA sent letter praising Singapore judiciary, when in fact no such letter was ever sent.

He can't be that shameless - can he?

I oppose this project by Class 95.

Too intrusive and oppressive.

I am against it.

Class 95, please end this nonsense.

Very disruptive to society, what you are doing.

Who the hell is class 95 to do that?

Moral police class 95?

Singapore already oppressive state already, they still want to make more bullshit.

Pui!

Fuck Off!

I film you FD and Glenn Ong, you happy or not?

Don't be bastard lah, go disturb people.

Go and fuck with Lee Kuan Yew lah.

Only first pic pink wah, the rest wear red.

If state propaganda media don't report on Lee Kuan Yew case, I will regard them as bastard media.

State propaganda media made a big noise on Tan Lead Shakes's family murder case.

I see whether they got report big big on Lee Kuan Yew alleged of lying case.

Don't be fucking bastard hor, state propaganda media, opposition murder case report big big, Lee Kuan Yew case keep quiet.

Don't be bastard, I warn you.

 

How you know very pain?

I hope that Lee Kuan Yew did not lie.

But if he did, I won't be surprised at all.

SDP should sue Lee Kuan Yew.

Hey mainstream state propaganda media, can report on this news or not?

Malaysia politics, anwar keep on report, Lee Kuan Yew alleged to be a liar, don't report.

Don't be such a fucker lah state propaganda media.

Report OK?

Thanks.

They should have one radio station that serves the state, sing praises of Lee Kuan Yew etc.

Other stations should be free and allowed to criticise.

Now all fucking state propaganda.

Ousted Nepal prince leaves nation

The former Crown Prince of Nepal, Paras Shah, has left the country for the first time in more than two years on a flight to Singapore.

There has been speculation that the controversial former heir to the now abolished throne is moving to the island city permanently.

But this has been denied by one of his close relatives.

Abhinesh Shah told the BBC there was "no way" that Paras was moving out of the country.

Mr Shah, who is married to Paras' first cousin, said Paras was instead looking for a good school for his three young children, whose education was being disrupted by constant strikes and traffic problems in Nepal.

He said Paras and his wife, Himani, would - as guardians - be spending a lot of time in Singapore, but added that once the children got older they might return to good schools in Nepal.

Mr Shah said Singapore's good medical facilities would be useful to the 37-year-old former prince who recently suffered a heart attack.

The pony-tailed former prince was pictured arriving at the airport before flying out to Singapore, reportedly with two bodyguards and his brother-in-law.

Controversial

The editor of Jana Astha, a weekly paper known for its royal stories, was quoted as saying Paras was concerned for the safety of his wife and three young children and was planning to leave Nepal for good.

But Mr Shah said he did not believe Paras was concerned for his family's security in Nepal.

There have however been press reports that the former princess is worried about that very issue.

As the son of ex-King Gyanendra, Paras was the first in line to the throne and was unpopular among Nepalis for his drunken antics and playboy lifestyle.

One observer here said that in travelling he was enjoying the advantages of being a commoner, which he became in May when a new assembly abolished the monarchy.

Like his father, his movements had been restricted for two years after the failure of a period of direct royal rule.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7484651.stm

Criticism of PAP regime only exists online.

Mainstream media is dominated by the state.

It exists to praise PAP regime, defend PAP regime and spread state propaganda.

Criticism of PAP regime does not exist in mainstream media.

Breaking news: IBA says it did not send letter that LKY testified it did

Wednesday, 02 July 2008 Singapore Democrats

In the recent defamation suit hearing to assess damages, Mr Lee Kuan Yew testified in court that the President of the International Bar Association (IBA) had written to the Law Society of Singapore praising the judiciary here.

This letter was apparently written following the organisation's annual conference held in Singapore in September last year.

The following is what Mr Lee said in court:

 

"Your honour, the International Bar Association decided to honour Singapore and hold its annual conference in this city and you [Dr Chee] were given an opportunity to present your case, with your complaint that Singapore lack the rule of law. There were some 3000 lawyers there.

I think they left Singapore with a very different impression from what you have projected because we have a letter from the President of the International Bar Association to the organisers, namely the Law Society of Singapore, how successful the meeting was and how impressed they were by the standards they found to obtain in the judiciary - " (see here also)

 

But the IBA has confirmed to the SDP that there was no such letter. According to the IBA its president did not write such a letter. The Law Society of Singapore has also denied that it has received any such letter from the IBA.

An IBA official said: "If there is another source of this letter, we do not know about it."

Mr Lee gave this evidence in the witness box during cross-examination by Dr Chee Soon Juan on 27 May 08.

The SDP will seek legal advice on this latest development.

In a related matter, Mr Lee's press secretary wrote to the Wall Street Journal stating that Dr Chee had called Singapore leaders "murderers, robbers, child molesters" and "rapists" in open court.

Dr Chee clearly said no such thing and has written to the newspaper challenging the Minister Mentor to produce the records showing that he (Dr Chee) did. (See here).

http://www.yoursdp.org/index.php/component/content/article/1-singapore/576-breaking

Class 95 want to be PAP state propaganda mouthpiece is one thing.

Target Singapore citizens with bullshit antics is another thing.

Don't be a fucker like Lee Kuan Yew class 95.

Fucking hell, all influenced by that bastard.

 

 

There was this morning, he was going on and on about how good ERP is and how it should have been implemented long ago.

FD can sing praises of Lee Kuan Yew, FD can defend Lee Kuan Yew, FD can go and repeat Lee Kuan YEw's propaganda, FD can go and suck Lee Kuan Yew's cock also okay, but please don't target Singaporeans.

Criticise Lee Kuan Yew don't dare, scared lose job, so praise him and target citizens.

What a fuck up situation.

FUCK YOU CLASS 95.

And you too MFB Lee Kuan Yew!

You happy lah Lee Kuan Yew, everyday got people sing your fucking praises on radio.

I also want someone to sing my fucking praises on Radio everyday.

DeerHunter, can you come to this forum and sing my fucking praises everyday?

Thanks.

That explains why sometimes you hear mediaco dj, dramas, praise the pap garbagemen.

Praise PAP regime?

Local drama serials, especially chinese ones are propagandist in nature. They are sometimes designed to spread a certain type of propaganda to try to influence your thinking.

For example, the current one showing at 9 PM.

There was a scene where a young married couple made the decision to NOT to buy car but to take public transport in order to save money.

That is the same policy that PAP regime is pushing now to the public.

They are trying to influence you through this type of cheap propaganda.

Radio, Print, TV, all mainstream media that generates public opinion is under state control.

They use it to spread state propaganda and brainwash you to control you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Century_of_the_Self

I dunno cos I am also this type...still can survive even hardly haha

And do you know WHY you are this type?

 

Ugly behaviour?

Go and film Lee Kuan Yew.

 

Target Singapore citizens you dare.

Target PAP regime don't dare.

Class 95 also a kiasu kiasee ugly bastard.

Pui.

Go and film when Lee Kuan Yew is going to die.

I want to watch that bastard die.

Fucking class 95, talk Singapore politics, criticise PAP regime don't dare, come and target citizens.

Ugly behaviour?

Go ask that bastard Lee Kuan Yew whether he has set a good example for people to follow.

Sue Sue Sue.

Like that good example of gracious society?

Tell him go and fuck off.

Under the rule of that bastard of course ugly lah.

Politically oppressive, state propaganda everywhere, MF bastard in power for life.

Go and fuck off class 95.

Fucking bastard you.

 

 

Class 95 FM is offering a cash prize of $950 to anyone who could record down and make public a video of Singaporeans behaving either badly or nobly in public.

That itself is ugly behaviour.

Tell people go and secretly film people at awakened moments for cash prize.

Fuck lah.

Go and film Lee Kuan Yew sue Chee Soon Juan.

Ugly behaviour also.

Dare or not class 95?

Don't dare right?

FUCK OFF LAH, state propaganda media.

Pui!

Come and suck my cock better lah.