进行注册
登入最近回复 由 Chin Eng
-
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Missing article? Shameless liar.....
To: freedomclub
What did I say?
"he will always come back with his delusions for us to have a good laugh."
....and as you can see, he still can't find the artcle after you pointed it out to him.
LoL...
when one has made a mistake one admits it....i truthfully declare that i did not scroll down the webpage when it was first published.
however it should also be noted that i did not read freedomclub's comment till today.
... and one more thing.... it's not whether it's your link or my link, both links are working today and will show your article without the need to scroll.
so when i first posted the screenshots, it was still a blank screen.... wherein the need to scroll down was never made known.
now that the link is fixed, your article is now revealed in it's full glory.
-
-
-
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:
But he don't retract apology, some may think that he had kowtowed to Lee Kuan Yew.
Then criticise him as a coward, jailed by PAP regime, become coward, don't dare to attack and criticise anymore.
That is worse I think.
well, it depends on which angle you are looking at it.in the first place, there is no need for the apology if he feels he is right - that's where the principle thing come in.
chia thye poh has it.... gopalan nair doesn't have.
why say sorry if you know you are right? afraid to go to jail..... that itself, is cowardice.
the fact that if an apology is given inspite of one's personal conviction means that one is just looking for a way out.
once such an apology is given, in that spirit, the man of principle no longer exist.
-
-
-
Originally posted by Poh Ah Pak:
Why Gopalan Nair no principle?
chia thye poh could have signed a piece of paper and he goes free.gopalan nair made an apology and once out of the country he retracts that apology.
... true heroes, in the face of adversity, remain strong and steadfast and unyielding.
... both chee and gopalan will apologise (and say whatever that is needed to say) to get out of trouble.
... of course, they will be those who argue that this is cunning on their part. however, is the lack of a steadfast virtue becoming of one who wishes to overthrow the garmen who they are criticising....???
-
-
-
Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
Why? You are not happy because it has been proven time and again that you are a delusional and/or liar and/or retarded idiot?
You need me to provide the links verifying that you are and/or all these?
It is ok to have differences in opinions but when people start lying, going on delusional trips, behave shamelessly... it is rather pointless to have any exchange with such types.
you will come back with the cert thing, the newspaper thing (which I have admitted I was wrong) and the sintercom thing (which i still confused about why I get a blank page).....
... but I have asked you to provide the links (please provide something other than the above).
... can someone have a different opinion without them delusional?
-
-
-
Originally posted by seyKai:
seeing more personal arguments than arguing on the topic
Please have a open mind and not behaving like kids
actually quite difficult to argue solely on the topic, it's ok to agree to disagree, however, here, when a thread ends with one fella calling other names like panty sniffer, ass dog, delusional.....how to continue????
or how about...
when you disagree with someone's views on any given issue, the next thing, you are labelled as a PAP supporter????
how???
-
-
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
at least there is some form of system and discipline here. come across forums whereby the mods refuse to moderate and allow all rubbish in there.
you are kidding right....mods allow all kinds of rubbish here too.... you, andy-boy etc etc...
and you will say that there's angel, chin eng, bear..
... see? we are also not very well moderated.....
-
-
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
see below, proof. post below insinuates disagreement, unhappiness with people criticising PAP, don't deny OK. see that you are here mainly for fault finding that is why never want to give up on creating nuisance for me. menopausing . . . . .. . . ha ha ha!
my goodness, that's all you can come up with.....???i don't praise PAP, i don't criticise PAP, i don't praise opposition, i don't criticise oppositions ('cept for chee who i think is not credible),
i ask your for evidence of me praising PAP and criticising opposition and that's all you can come up with...???
I AM CRITICISING ANDREWPKYAP, who has clearly stated that he is NOT opposition....
boy, you are more numbnut that i thought....
-
-
-
Originally posted by Fantagf:
ha ha ha say what you want. if you are uncomfortable reading the posts nobody is forcing you to read. This is a forum for all people so you can expect all views. Unfortunately, there are more people who don't agree with the PAP so you get to read negative views, comments, feedback about PAP. Can't be helped, unless you can go on change their mind. ha ha ha ha ha. no need for you to take it out with me when you are not happy, it tells something of you, ha ha hah.
.... again another unsubstantiated accusation....please show me ONE post that I had disagreed with people who criticise PAP?
and ONE post that I praised PAP?
-
-
-
all kids should be made to read "Seven Habits of highly effectively teens" by Sean Covey.
my sons read this book while they were around 10 to 11 yrs old.
my teenage older son is taller than me and can beat me to a pulp if he wants to.... but we all get around very very well, do projects together, play games, discuss life etc.
-
-
-
Originally posted by Shotgun:
Woah... juicy.
What kinda evidence you have?? SHare leh!
you really think andy-boy got concrete evidence...??? cannot even prove his book exist....actually andy-boy is not the first or the last to declare that he has concrete evidence.... but got such good evidence to bring down a dictator, what should he be scared of? just work with some opposition parties and bring down PAP....
but methinks, these are all hot air.
Edited by Chin Eng 28 Nov `08, 1:09PM
-
