Name callings and Mudslinging is the weapon of choice
-
when unable to defend or defending the indefensible, it is justiable to resort to discrediting, mudslining and name calling, and even trolling. A simple question like is it justifiable for babies to be borned deformed and you have all these brilliant and scholarly answers to the questions. all they do is, answering everything but the question. what brilliant thinkers these people are. I have a brilliant answer to that. If there is no abnormality, how do you know what is normal. aye brilliant reply isnt it.
I suppose these people are all words and no actions. whatever is the teachings of love your enemies? what about judgement? so these people judge us by all sorts of name calling and mudslinging. that is why, these people only talk only, never walk the talk.
I have yet to see a coherent and logical replies posed by non believers. I suppose their way of answering but the question is already the answers to the question. you can then make a conclusion and summary of what the religion is about.
-
-
Originally posted by Rooney9:
when unable to defend or defending the indefensible, it is justiable to resort to discrediting, mudslining and name calling, and even trolling. A simple question like is it justifiable for babies to be borned deformed and you have all these brilliant and scholarly answers to the questions. all they do is, answering everything but the question. what brilliant thinkers these people are. I have a brilliant answer to that. If there is no abnormality, how do you know what is normal. aye brilliant reply isnt it.
I suppose these people are all words and no actions. whatever is the teachings of love your enemies? what about judgement? so these people judge us by all sorts of name calling and mudslinging. that is why, these people only talk only, never walk the talk.
I have yet to see a coherent and logical replies posed by non believers. I suppose their way of answering but the question is already the answers to the question. you can then make a conclusion and summary of what the religion is about.
Finally we can see eye to eye on something.
I have yet to see a coherent and logical replies posed by non believers.
THAT'S ABSOLUTELY RIGHT! to be fair, actually it's mostly you and some of your cronies, not every single one of them. to be even fairer, i shall not fault u too much, later you complain i bully you again.
-
Originally posted by Rooney9:
when unable to defend or defending the indefensible, it is justiable to resort to discrediting, mudslining and name calling, and even trolling. A simple question like is it justifiable for babies to be borned deformed and you have all these brilliant and scholarly answers to the questions. all they do is, answering everything but the question. what brilliant thinkers these people are. I have a brilliant answer to that. If there is no abnormality, how do you know what is normal. aye brilliant reply isnt it.
I suppose these people are all words and no actions. whatever is the teachings of love your enemies? what about judgement? so these people judge us by all sorts of name calling and mudslinging. that is why, these people only talk only, never walk the talk.
I have yet to see a coherent and logical replies posed by non believers. I suppose their way of answering but the question is already the answers to the question. you can then make a conclusion and summary of what the religion is about.
there there... don't have another hissy fit.
what you sow you shall reap isn't that a biblical principle? so you come in slinging mud and name calling believers... it just gets given back right?
-
Originally posted by Rooney9:
if the faith doesnt believe in karma, where is the what comes around goes around or comeuppance came from?
if the faith doesnt believe in rebirth, this should be the end of life after one passes away. where got such a thing as going to heaven or hell? isnt that considered as the next life? you see, so much inconsistencies and fallacy. I dun even know where go begin for a start.
there're simple questions but the answers to them are never so easy. maybe to you, it's black and white, no shades of grey which is why you're only to comprehend as little as you can. my suggestion to you is stay within your own worldview, because that's the only one that allows you to be closed minded and irrational. your mind isn't quite able to take in more than that at the moment. so there's still hope! take heart!
karma, faith, rebirth, what goes around comes around ... are you a buddhist who's trying to convert other people by attempting to call out the so called "inconsistencies" but ignoring your very own personal ones?
-
-
Originally posted by Rooney9:
for your info, karma and rebirth are not only the tenets of Buddhism, they are also Hinduism and baghavad Gita and a few other religions native in India.
ok maybe I should not have said this, I took this back. If I made a mistake, I will say so. probably I am getting too carried away. But then I still take the stand that the concept of god is a fallacy.
So you take the stand that the concept of Yahweh is fallacy, and yet many others will take the opposing stand... so then again I ask you why do you choose to come here and challenge a stand different to yours?? what do you hope to achieve and prove?? or if someone said hinduism was the correct religion, but that differed with what you believed in, then how?
-
its funny and hilarious that the onus is on one to provide a basis or platform in which the question is based.
Question: Why was the Japanese so cruel in WWII.
Answer by the Jap: On what basis was your question based on? what platform did you based your question on? before I answer you this, you need to reply on the basis and platform first.
There are no more questions, thank you
-
Originally posted by breytonhartge:
So you take the stand that the concept of Yahweh is fallacy, and yet many others will take the opposing stand... so then again I ask you why do you choose to come here and challenge a stand different to yours?? what do you hope to achieve and prove?? or if someone said hinduism was the correct religion, but that differed with what you believed in, then how?
if all religions were to interpret according to their beliefs, then which religion do you think is the truth? you will say your religion is true and so is other religion. but there can only be one truth and facts.
-
Originally posted by Rooney9:
if the faith doesnt believe in karma, where is the what comes around goes around or comeuppance came from?
if the faith doesnt believe in rebirth, this should be the end of life after one passes away. where got such a thing as going to heaven or hell? isnt that considered as the next life? you see, so much inconsistencies and fallacy. I dun even know where go begin for a start.
Originally posted by Rooney9:for your info, karma and rebirth are not only the tenets of Buddhism, they are also Hinduism and baghavad Gita and a few other religions native in India.
ok maybe I should not have said this, I took this back. If I made a mistake, I will say so. probably I am getting too carried away. But then I still take the stand that the concept of god is a fallacy.
-
Originally posted by Rooney9:
if all religions were to interpret according to their beliefs, then which religion do you think is the truth? you will say your religion is true and so is other religion. but there can only be one truth and facts.
I don't believe in religion. still you are not answering the question, why do you want to prove that a particular religion is right or wrong? what do you hope to accomplish?
-
Why even create this thread in the first place. If you really wanted to ask questions in a christain point of view, why even insult it, comes back to why even ask it in the first place. , tossing accusations back and forth with no true allegation and bear nothing but animosity towards it proc them to do the same to you. You attack them, they attack you. So where does it end? When the other side is eliminated?
-
Originally posted by breytonhartge:
I don't believe in religion. still you are not answering the question, why do you want to prove that a particular religion is right or wrong? what do you hope to accomplish?
the myth of god. I want to explain how religion came about and even the concept of god was created and invented by man. I want to dispel the myth of god. even the bible has so much of inconsistencies and paradoxes. why is it so?because it was written by unknown man. -
Originally posted by Rooney9:
the myth of god. I want to explain how religion came about and even the concept of god was created and invented by man. I want to dispel the myth of god. even the bible has so much of inconsistencies and paradoxes. why is it so?because it was written by unknown man.to you the bible is a story book, to the Jewish people this is their HISTORY. if Yahweh was such a myth, why then would there be generation after generation of Jew who believe in Hashem?
-
Originally posted by breytonhartge:
to you the bible is a story book, to the Jewish people this is their HISTORY. if Yahweh was such a myth, why then would there be generation after generation of Jew who believe in Hashem?
the religion was started from there. why is it do u think Jews are god's chosen people if it was not written by a Jew?
the reason is simple. like you and many others, they were hoodwinked for they do not know the truth. the truth of the matter is the concept of god was clearly invented and created by a Jew, a man.
-
Originally posted by Rooney9:
the religion was started from there. why is it do u think Jews are god's chosen people if it was not written by a Jew?
the reason is simple. like you and many others, they were hoodwinked for they do not know the truth. the truth of the matter is the concept of god was clearly invented and created by a Jew, a man.
and can you prove beyond a shadow of a double that G_d was invented by man? you cannot can you? so can you be entirely sure that G_d does not exist? this will run both sides, and having been on both sides, I would say without a shadow of a doubt that G_d exists. It's like the matrix, when you see you see, when you don't you still live in the system... now the question is this, are you so sure that you are the one that is out of the system?
-
Originally posted by breytonhartge:
and can you prove beyond a shadow of a double that G_d was invented by man? you cannot can you? so can you be entirely sure that G_d does not exist? this will run both sides, and having been on both sides, I would say without a shadow of a doubt that G_d exists. It's like the matrix, when you see you see, when you don't you still live in the system... now the question is this, are you so sure that you are the one that is out of the system?
I am neither in nor out because I do not share your beliefs. if there is no god, wherein lies the system or matrix? do you see the light here? how can I be in a system when it doesnt exists.
-
Originally posted by breytonhartge:
and can you prove beyond a shadow of a double that G_d was invented by man? you cannot can you? so can you be entirely sure that G_d does not exist? this will run both sides, and having been on both sides, I would say without a shadow of a doubt that G_d exists. It's like the matrix, when you see you see, when you don't you still live in the system... now the question is this, are you so sure that you are the one that is out of the system?
100% sure. You see Jesus as the son of God, but also God at the same time.
I see zombie Jesus.