I have said before liao, the earth will continue to exist for the next 1 billion years. after all earth was said to be in existence for 6 billion years, since it existed for 6 billion years, so why not for another 1 billion years? if not 1 billion years, at least another 100 million years, if not 100 million, then at least 1million years. so 2000, 2012, 3000, 5000? LOL a mere few thousand years the earth will crumble up and disappear LOL. what nonsense is that these ancient naysayers, who doesnt even know the earth was round then.
Originally posted by I No Stupid:will we all be shaken off?
neh, the earth will jump off to another universe in another dimension
Originally posted by lce:
neh, the earth will jump off to another universe in another dimension
ya ya ya.
Damn! I probably won't be around to see that happen.
2012 is not armageddon. It may be a major catastrophe.
Maybe something like 1918 flu pandemic.
1918 flu was man-made.................
long overdued for the next one.................
The Collapse of Nestle will be a major disaster
no more Milo hor......................
we can do without the fictional God....................
but without Milo.....................si liao lor....................
Originally posted by Rooney9:I have said before liao, the earth will continue to exist for the next 1 billion years. after all earth was said to be in existence for 6 billion years, since it existed for 6 billion years, so why not for another 1 billion years? if not 1 billion years, at least another 100 million years, if not 100 million, then at least 1million years. so 2000, 2012, 3000, 5000? LOL a mere few thousand years the earth will crumble up and disappear LOL. what nonsense is that these ancient naysayers, who doesnt even know the earth was round then.
Earth may stay but all human beings may die before that.
Anticrist will rise ?
It's already rising if not risen . if we imagine it would be an army of people who do not believe in jesus . we are dreaming .
what it meant was all those acts and behaviours that doesnt go according to what recommended in the bible . believe me we are all antichrist in someway because in today modern and materialistic world somewhere along the line we know that really dont hold on to ancient bible values as much as those ancient people .
your beliefs are dangerous to a secular society. not everyone believes in your religion mind you and you labeled them as anti christ, gee, what a bigot you are. I bet the bible doesnt say the earth was round in ancient times wasnt it.
if the bible is so accurate, it would have stated the earth was round and not square and that there were 8 planets revolving the sun in our solar system. science is proving the fallacy of the bible. if the bible is the truth, it would have stood the test of time, but no.
one blatant fallacy was, how can earth be created in a mere 6 days. u cant even build a1 storey house in 6 days, much less the size of the earth. if god is all powerful, it would have created in an instant, why take 6 days? science is telling us the earth is at least 6 billion years based on carbon dating of fossils and rock formation. it is ludicrous to say earth was created in 6 days. do I need to continue?
Originally posted by Rooney9:if the bible is so accurate, it would have stated the earth was round and not square and that there were 8 planets revolving the sun in our solar system. science is proving the fallacy of the bible. if the bible is the truth, it would have stood the test of time, but no.
one blatant fallacy was, how can earth be created in a mere 6 days. u cant even build a1 storey house in 6 days, much less the size of the earth. if god is all powerful, it would have created in an instant, why take 6 days? science is telling us the earth is at least 6 billion years based on carbon dating of fossils and rock formation. it is ludicrous to say earth was created in 6 days.
They have built a 15 storey Hotel in 6 days
http://www.cnngo.com/shanghai/life/build-hotel-six-days-china-it-can-and-has-been-done-673433
The Universe was created in a split of a cosmic second if the Big Bang Theory stays corrected
Originally posted by lce:
They have built a 15 storey Hotel in 6 dayshttp://www.cnngo.com/shanghai/life/build-hotel-six-days-china-it-can-and-has-been-done-673433
The Universe was created in a split of a cosmic second if the Big Bang Theory stays corrected
bingo. so it is not god who created the universe after all. thanks for pointing this out.
everything write in black and white...den nth will go wrong~
they cant even get this fact right that the earth was round. when copernicus said the earth was round, those churches wanted him killed cos not only they disagreed, but cannot accept any challenge to their truths or authority.
Newton was not the first of the age of reason, the great rationalist scientist as conventional history likes to protray. He was the "last of the magicians".
He belonged and was a product of the pre-newtonian age.
For the oligarchy, Newton and Galileo are the only two contenders for the honor of being the most influential thinker of their faction since Aristotle himself.
The British oligarchy praises Newton as the founder of modern science. But, at the same time, they have been unable to keep secret the fact that Newton was a raving irrationalist, a cultist kook.
Among the oligarchs, it was the British economist Lord John Maynard Keynes and a fellow Cambridge graduate who began to open the black box of Newton's real character.
Was Newton the first and greatest of the modern scientists, the practitioner of cold and untinctured reason?
No, said Keynes, Newton was not the first of the Age of Reason.
He was the last of the magicians, the last of the Babylonians and Sumerians, the last wonderful child to whom the Magi could do sincere and appropriate homage.
Keynes based his view on the contents of a box. What was in the box? The box contained papers which Newton had packed up when he left Cambridge for London in 1696, ending his Cambridge career and beginning his new life in London as member and president of the British Royal Society, director of the mint, resident magus of the new British Empire.
Inside the box were manuscripts and papers totalling some 1.2 million words. After Newton's death, Bishop Horsley was asked to inspect the box, with a view to publication, but when he saw the contents, he recoiled in horror and slammed the lid. A century passed. Newton's nineteenth-century biographer, Sir David Brewster, looked into the box. He decided to save Newton's reputation by printing a few selections, but he falsified the rest with straight fibbing, as Keynes says. The box became known as the Portsmouth Papers. A few mathematical papers were given to Cambridge in 1888.
In 1936, the current owner, Lord Lymington, needed money, so he had the rest auctioned off. Keynes bought as many as he could, but other papers were scattered from Jersualem to America.
As Keynes points out, Newton was a suspicious, paranoid, unstable personality. In 1692, Newton had a nervous breakdown and never regained his former consistency of mind. Pepys and Locke thought that he had become deranged. Newton emerged from his breakdown slightly ``gaga.'' As Keynes stresses, Newton ``was wholly aloof from women,'' although he had some close young male friends. He once angrily accused John Locke of trying to embroil him with women.
In the past decades, the lid of the box has been partially and grudgingly opened by the Anglophile scholars who are the keepers of the Newton myth. What can we see inside the box?
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/venscien.htm#newton
What you don't know about Newton
http://www.slate.com/id/2108438/
Newton, the Man by John Maynard Keynes
It is with some diffidence that I try to speak to you in his own home of Newton as he was himself. I have long been a student of the records and had the intention to put my impressions into writing to be ready for Christmas Day 1942, the tercentenary of his birth. The war has deprived me both of leisure to treat adequately so great a theme and of opportunity to consult my library and my papers and to verify my impressions. So if the brief study which I shall lay before you today is more perfunctory than it should be, I hope you will excuse me.
One other preliminary matter. I believe that Newton was different from the conventional picture of him. But I do not believe he was less great. He was less ordinary, more extraordinary, than the nineteenth century cared to make him out. Geniuses are very peculiar. Let no one here suppose that my object today is to lessen, by describing, Cambridge's greatest son. I am trying rather to see him as his own friends and contemporaries saw him. And they without exception regarded him as one of the greatest of men.
In the eighteenth century and since, Newton came to be thought of as the first and greatest of the modern age of scientists, a rationalist, one who taught us to think on the lines of cold and untinctured reason.
I do not see him in this light. I do not think that any one who has pored over the contents of that box which he packed up when he finally left Cambridge in 1696 and which, though partly dispersed, have come down to us, can see him like that.
Newton was not the first of the age of reason. He was the last of the magicians, the last of the Babylonians and Sumerians, the last great mind which looked out on the visible and intellectual world with the same eyes as those who began to build our intellectual inheritance rather less than 10,000 years ago.
Isaac Newton, a posthumous child bom with no father on Christmas Day, 1642, was the last wonderchild to whom the Magi could do sincere and appropriate homage...
http://www.gap-system.org/~history/Extras/Keynes_Newton.html
then Nicola Tesla must be god himself lor....................
so when is the end of the world?
Originally posted by Rooney9:so when is the end of the world?
whose world?
Originally posted by lce:
whose world?
u ask those christians lar
Christians know nuts about anything...................
whole day and night daydreaming and wishful thinking about a fictional life in a fictional heaven.................
they worshipping something that does not exists. they defending something that does not exists too. they praising something that does not exists.
Everyone is crazy :)
basically it is praising and giving to the god, cos the god will bring them to heaven. everything is god's will and anything and everthing is created by god, nothing much. I dun think I can accept this kind of reasoning and preachings, sorry to say. not that god exists though is another issue altogether.