Praying for our Ministers
-
alize, BIC,
Actually logically speaking, if we want to pray for our ministers, we should pray to as many gods as possible to maximise chances.
From jade emperor, zeus, kwanyin to jesus, YHWH, allah and sikh god.
Just suggesting. I know of people who do that though
-
Originally posted by Tcmc:
alize, BIC,
Actually logically speaking, if we want to pray for our ministers, we should pray to as many gods as possible to maximise chances.
From jade emperor, zeus, kwanyin to jesus, YHWH, allah and sikh god.
Just suggesting. I know of people who do that though
Actually I don't see how you are being logical at all. It looks more patronising to me than anything.
-
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
Actually I don't see how you are being logical at all. It looks more patronising to me than anything.
No... I am just saying, it increases your chance.
-
Originally posted by Tcmc:
No... I am just saying, it increases your chance.
And you are assuming?????
-
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
And you are assuming?????
Logically speaking it should be the more gods you try, the higher chance of getting heard.
-
Originally posted by Tcmc:
Logically speaking it should be the more gods you try, the higher chance of getting heard.
Again what is your assumption????
-
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
Again what is your assumption????
BIC
assuming all gods have equal chance of existence lo
-
Originally posted by Tcmc:
BIC
assuming all gods have equal chance of existence lo
Wrong. That's assuming all gods of all religions exist. But this is an irrational conclusion.
-
bible study lessons again?
please get fuck to get yr life
-
Originally posted by lce:
bible study lessons again?
please get fuck to get yr life
Xxxxed. Past tense.
Capitalized the 1st letter in every sentence. :p -
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
Wrong. That's assuming all gods of all religions exist. But this is an irrational conclusion.
LOL.
How is it irrational when all religions are at the same point - claim an invisible being exists, but followers have never seen him physically and claim miracles etc?
-
Originally posted by Tcmc:
LOL.
How is it irrational when all religions are at the same point - claim an invisible being exists, but followers have never seen him physically and claim miracles etc?
You are shifting goalpost liao.
-
spaghetti monster exist, i tell u
-
I saw Thor in the theatres....
-
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
You are shifting goalpost liao.
Wrong use of fallacy. No (greater) evidence was demanded. Yours is an issue of pov and premise of the argument.
-
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
You are shifting goalpost liao.
BIC
I always maintain and communicate to you that all religions are equal because they claim the same things (invisible beings, miracles).
So al start at the same point,
-
Originally posted by Tcmc:
BIC
I always maintain and communicate to you that all religions are equal because they claim the same things (invisible beings, miracles).
So al start at the same point,
Then you are simply being superficial in your assessment, if it can even be called that. Yes, most religions affirm the existence of the supernatural world, and religious people form the majority of the world's population, which means atheists have to work really hard to explain why this is so. And if atheism is true, why are there so few atheists?
-
Appeal to majority... like a popularity contest... Tops is Islam... unless you can merge the Christian denominations as a uniform grouping
-
I pray to hear some good news soon.
-
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
Then you are simply being superficial in your assessment, if it can even be called that. Yes, most religions affirm the existence of the supernatural world, and religious people form the majority of the world's population, which means atheists have to work really hard to explain why this is so. And if atheism is true, why are there so few atheists?
LOL
Trust you to commit this error of majority = correct.
So if many people take drugs one day, they are right?
-
Originally posted by Tcmc:
LOL
Trust you to commit this error of majority = correct.
So if many people take drugs one day, they are right?
LOL indeed! This is a question that I have personally encountered from nonbelievers and I was simply recasting it back to you.
BTW, if you do not believe in absolute morality, how can you even judge whether majority is right or wrong? Now don't you tell me you believe in absolutes or objective morality, because that is not provided under the atheist's worldview.