Wow ! Fulham beat Chelsea ?
-
arsenal is still the best team to watch.
their attacking game is the most entertaining. -
A Chelsea win is a notion that actually encourage $ to buy tropies.Originally posted by BrUtUs:rather see chelsea or even sunderland win the title every season than see manu winning...
This mentally is so like any Glory hunter out there.
How much of a football fan are U? -
Because he's Mourinho.Originally posted by dragg:this much i agree.
i dont understand why he cant just accept defeat.
-
becuz wenger has never beaten mourinho..Originally posted by LazerLordz:Rather Manchester United win the title than Chelsea.
And if a Gunner like me thinks like this, you should guess how much we despise Mourinho. -
wat im saying has nothing to do with money or glory, it just means im no fan of manu(ABU) and i rather not see them winning... and btw, manu use money to buy success too so its not jz chelsea doing it... about chelsea winning title this season, them winning the title definitely has relation to using money but remember if u watch other leagues, spending money big doesnt mean guranteeed title success.... infact, this season, they win is because the other teams messed up and they were the only consistent team winning during the past months... so its not totally money that changed the game... finally, im not a chelsea fan so u can hold on to your statement on glory hunters and being a fan... tk...Originally posted by shining_force:A Chelsea win is a notion that actually encourage $ to buy tropies.
This mentally is so like any Glory hunter out there.
How much of a football fan are U? -
"nabeiz.. u dare to say u see i handball?" -
lolxOriginally posted by www:
"nabeiz.. u dare to say u see i handball?" -
tell me which club did not win the premiership with money?Originally posted by shining_force:A Chelsea win is a notion that actually encourage $ to buy tropies.
This mentally is so like any Glory hunter out there.
How much of a football fan are U?
which poor club won a premiership? -
-
Haha i guss he as saying from his lip movement.Originally posted by www:
"nabeiz.. u dare to say u see i handball?"
Swee Lor..Buay Fulham Sibo??... Ki stamford bridge Lim Peh Ho Le Si.. -
manchester united and real madrid the top 2 richest club can't even buy thier way to success............@ Least Chelsea can because they have a good manager And I am certain Man Utd And Real.Madrid have Jose in thier Side they would have won alot of trophies and not to mention AC Milan with lots of Stars and yet not successfulOriginally posted by shining_force:A Chelsea win is a notion that actually encourage $ to buy tropies.
This mentally is so like any Glory hunter out there.
How much of a football fan are U? -
Any club less rich than chelski is "poor" lor....dun be lazy, go count yourself!Originally posted by dragg:tell me which club did not win the premiership with money?
which poor club won a premiership?
-
Since when has chelski won ALOT (let's say 10 and above can liao)of trophies with their UNlimited richness!? Be patient la....wait for ur time to come!
-
Another thing, are fans really tat proud of their clubs "buying" their way to success?!
-
they bought players with money and the players won the titles. they did not buy the title with money.Originally posted by Redz:Another thing, are fans really tat proud of their clubs "buying" their way to success?!
did liverpool spend very little in the transfer market?
frankly if RA had bought liverpool will you say the same thing? i am sure you will laughing everyday. -
if u wana aim chelsea fine..please talk about barca too..dun be so biased..Originally posted by Redz:Another thing, are fans really tat proud of their clubs "buying" their way to success?! -
teams spending little doesnt mean they are not 'buying' title also... it can mean they are more good in doing business and not being made a carrot... but in the end buy who also no use, its whether the manager can do the magic also...
tink mod better jz close the topic as theres no end to the argument... -
i agree. there are a lot of teams that spend a lot and is still spending now. they cant justify their winning for the amount they spent.Originally posted by BrUtUs:teams spending little doesnt mean they are not 'buying' title also... it can mean they are more good in doing business and not being made a carrot... but in the end buy who also no use, its whether the manager can do the magic also...
inter is one good example. they spent a lot but just arent successful.
it is only fair we give credit to chelsea for their success. even though most of us dont like mourihno. -
Fulham is not very bad what? so not really surprise when they pull an upset.
It just prove one thing.... the ball is round. -
He has his point here , which club never buy players ? The point is , u buy a couple , with a certain budget , and carefully . Chelsea ? Does Chelsea has a budget ? They has unlimited budget , they have got no valuation for a certain players , that's our point ! U can buy anyhow , anywhere and anyprice , whether is there a need or not , that's another question .Originally posted by stellazio:if u wana aim chelsea fine..please talk about barca too..dun be so biased..
No biase la friend , that's a proven data . They spent 200 million in three years ?
Who spent 200 million buying players in three years ? -
Originally posted by BrUtUs:
As what my fella CooMyth said this before to me : " I prefer to let it be . "
tink mod better jz close the topic as theres no end to the argument...[/b]
Let it be , let it be , let it be , let it be ......Beatles The Greatest ! -
u see ar..its clubs that wana kope as much money as possible from chelsea..Originally posted by Poolman:He has his point here , which club never buy players ? The point is , u buy a couple , with a certain budget , and carefully . Chelsea ? Does Chelsea has a budget ? They has unlimited budget , they have got no valuation for a certain players , that's our point ! U can buy anyhow , anywhere and anyprice , whether is there a need or not , that's another question .
No biase la friend , that's a proven data . They spent 200 million in three years ?
Who spent 200 million buying players in three years ?
not that kenyon wana pay so much..rmb that stingy fella who refused to pay 2M - 3M for ronaldinho at man utd?
but clubs know that they can hold chelsea to ransom thats y they wana earn a deal..