Originally posted by the Bear:
with GH, you can't get anywhere because even the best players become useless with him around?
however, with a brilliant manager, you can make a bunch of mediocre players into a GREAT team!
there's always two sides on a coin.
at times, its not solely the manager's fault. i always stress that both players' attitudes and determinations are just as important as manager's the credibility.
let's look at a few examples:
bobby robson, one of the great managers, almost faced relegation managing newcastle at a point of time. was it because of the team or the manager?
peter reid was once a unheard name until he brought sunderland fame and glory a few years ago. with proven records, his credibility was again questioned after he failed to wake leeds from their slumber.
so is it his managerial skills or the players abilities/mentalities? mind you, leeds aint a lousy team.
on the other hand, consider raineri's position. he is armed with a team, if not, two teams of skillful players. yet, chelsea is always struggling to win their opponent. just look at their goal difference every match.
my point here is that it takes two hands to clap. one has to understand that the winning formula doesnt always lies with the manager, but with the players as well.
i personally dont hate GH, but i dont fancy his defensive strategies as well. look at the bright side, liverpool is now at 4th spot instead of fighting for relegation.
at least he is doing his job better than roy evans, who could even smell third spot, as far as i recall.
standing from neutral point of view, i aint really bothered if GH stays with liverpool next season or not.
it is just that i have been hearing so many negative and solemn opinions as if they can do a better job. if so, why aint these people managing liverpool but GH?
maybe they played too much championship manager? hehe