I agree with you on this. However it also has to be a decision to make loneliness be seen like your shadow, is it in front of you or behind your figure?Originally posted by Rhonda:That is soooooooooooo NOT TRUE!
Which is worse, to be lonely in a crowd, or to be alone in solitude?
The few mentioned above are ways to ease loneliness, thru distraction and positive acts. Have it ever occured to you that even though you do all of the above and more...you've enjoyed it, but still felt lonely?Originally posted by cindtan29:totally agree for the above...plus...
the perception of lonely also depends on oneself...u can jolly well choose to make ur time fuller by taking courses (cookery,language) or breeding pets (dogs, cats) and also travel (if financial status allows it)
BINGO!!! You've hit the nail on the head!!Originally posted by M©+square:I agree with you on this. However it also has to be a decision to make loneliness be seen like your shadow, is it in front of you or behind your figure?
People like small talk and never really want to get involved with anything deeper than the matters of the heart.
It takes more effort to listen, understand.
It takes more responsibility to engage into serious, heartfelt talks.
Many times we feel lonely, could it be due to the thought 'we desire to speak but who is there to listen?' Depression sets in...
To be lonely in a crowd: searching for identity...once again?
It could happen at any age.
True, activities can never replace 'heart-to-heart talk'.Originally posted by M©+square:The few mentioned above are ways to ease loneliness, thru distraction and positive acts. Have it ever occured to you that even though you do all of the above and more...you've enjoyed it, but still felt lonely?
What really has to be confronted is the 'heart issue'
Enjoy Solitude, it'll help lots.Originally posted by Rhonda:True, activities can never replace 'heart-to-heart talk'.
What activities do is to fill up your time and hopefully distract you and make you while the time away and hopefully, forget your need to interact on a deep level but ultimately it doesn't address the issue and it will pop up again.
Precisely! This does not apply just to poets - it applies to artists, actors and actresses, dancers, writers, playwrights ... any and all folks who tend to have an artistic and highly creative streak in them. Heightened sensitivity enables these people to convey emotions through their craft and the setback of being talented this way is depression.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Those who can feel and feel deeply fall into depression and melancholy easily.That's why the best poets are the ones who are almost suicidal in nature or have nothing to care in this world.
Agree with Rhonda, not only poets but people who has keen artistic senses and highly creative; mostly not only fall into depression easily, they fell into distorted lifestyle and completely self absorbed in their own world, esp for those well known.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Those who can feel and feel deeply fall into depression and melancholy easily.That's why the best poets are the ones who are almost suicidal in nature or have nothing to care in this world.
You didn't ask why do they end up depressed? Since their emotions could have led to happiness and normal. What do you think?Originally posted by Rhonda:Precisely! This does not apply just to poets - it applies to artists, actors and actresses, dancers, writers, playwrights ... any and all folks who tend to have an artistic and highly creative streak in them. Heightened sensitivity enables these people to convey emotions through their craft and the setback of being talented this way is depression.
I asked my Literature tutor once, 'Are there any happy writers at all? Someone who lived a somewhat 'normal' and decent life that was not messed up?' and she answered, 'Yes, but only one that I know of - P. G. Wodehouse.'
Heh.During my school days, I've read of Sylvia Plath's life and it was sad.And she was that sort of person who wrote better when she was falling deeper and deeper into depression.Originally posted by Rhonda:Precisely! This does not apply just to poets - it applies to artists, actors and actresses, dancers, writers, playwrights ... any and all folks who tend to have an artistic and highly creative streak in them. Heightened sensitivity enables these people to convey emotions through their craft and the setback of being talented this way is depression.
I asked my Literature tutor once, 'Are there any happy writers at all? Someone who lived a somewhat 'normal' and decent life that was not messed up?' and she answered, 'Yes, but only one that I know of - P. G. Wodehouse.'
Sometimes it takes the presence of pain to show joy, or the lack of joy, in a clearer way.And have you noticed that the best works deal with feeling and when you see reality around you, cheerfulness is something transient, for we all slog and work and worry so much so that cheefulness has been downgraded to another emotion.It has lost its place as our primary emotion and to be able to feel this loss, is to feel that same pain inside you.Originally posted by M©+square:You didn't ask why do they end up depressed? Since their emotions could have led to happiness and normal. What do you think?
Whats your background anyway? Lit grad?
I'm eager to hear your reply
I understand totally only that we're in different subject. I'm in Arts too.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Sometimes it takes the presence of pain to show joy, or the lack of joy, in a clearer way.And have you noticed that the best works deal with feeling and when you see reality around you, cheerfulness is something transient, for we all slog and work and worry so much so that cheefulness has been downgraded to another emotion.It has lost its place as our primary emotion and to be able to feel this loss, is to feel that same pain inside you.
I think Rhonda does have a Lit background..Me too..Studied Lit at 'O' and 'A' levels.
Arts?What major?Originally posted by M©+square:I understand totally only that we're in different subject. I'm in Arts too.
Secret. The fine Arts section.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Arts?What major?
Haha,OkayOriginally posted by M©+square:Secret. The fine Arts section.
Originally posted by M©+square:You didn't ask why do they end up depressed? Since their emotions could have led to happiness and normal. What do you think?
Whats your background anyway? Lit grad?
I'm eager to hear your reply
Originally posted by LazerLordz:Yup, guys! I studied English Literature at 'O' and 'A' levels, tried for the 'S' paper too. However, that was sooooooo long ago that I've forgotten almost all of what I've learnt then.
I think Rhonda does have a Lit background..Me too..Studied Lit at 'O' and 'A' levels.
Oh yeah... that was nothing compared to the 'S' Paper. We had to read a novel or play every week and sometimes, we'd be tortured with two. Read soooo many books my mom was complaining about the money spent, because I had to get the Arden Shakespeare, not just any ol' Shakespeare book for all the plays we had to read.Originally posted by LazerLordz:I keep my demon locked up..sometimes if he rattles the bars, I just rap him on the nose with my nightstick.
We can learn to exploit these "demons" for better things..as a fuel to drive your pursuit to greater heights..
(Remember how many essays we had to write for Lit at 'A' levels..terrible..ouch.)
I had to do a play/poem every week for Practical Criticism and got bogged down with Romantic period writings..I think in the end, they really gave me an insight into the workings of women...Originally posted by Rhonda:Oh yeah... that was nothing compared to the 'S' Paper. We had to read a novel or play every week and sometimes, we'd be tortured with two. Read soooo many books my mom was complaining about the money spent, because I had to get the Arden Shakespeare, not just any ol' Shakespeare book for all the plays we had to read.
I wanted to study Literature in NUS and teach Literature after that but when I couldn't make it, I cried buckets and was sooo depressed, I refused to touch any literary works for months and months. A few years later, I had almost completely forgotten what I used to know at my fingertips. Selective amnesia.
And yes, I totally understand what you mean about keeping the inner demon in check. But you know what, these things will only be fully understood by the few of us who feel more than we think.
Practical Criticism was my favourite paper in Literature. I really really loved it. It ranked up there with General Paper as my favourite subjects in JC.Originally posted by LazerLordz:I had to do a play/poem every week for Practical Criticism and got bogged down with Romantic period writings..I think in the end, they really gave me an insight into the workings of women...
But I loved Lit.Always have and always will.But taking it as a major might just have an opposite effect on me...I'd rather leave it as something nice and for leisure.
Oooohh... an artist!Originally posted by M©+square:Lits...err....i only know paint and brushes...canvas.
That's about it.
The demon within? yeah i understand...
Remember there would be a Qn where you have to continue the prose according to the author's intention and literary device used..I loved that.Originally posted by Rhonda:Practical Criticism was my favourite paper in Literature. I really really loved it. It ranked up there with General Paper as my favourite subjects in JC.
Nope... are we talking about the same paper? E7? Or have they modified the syllabus since?Originally posted by LazerLordz:Remember there would be a Qn where you have to continue the prose according to the author's intention and literary device used..I loved that.
And [email protected] to do with crafting through feelings is worthy of being here.