+1Originally posted by Rhonda:Yah mah!! You? You also take us seriously mah!
I guess Lau's trying to tell us that he's a chronic liar!Originally posted by sacredspirits:b'cos u sound 'sincere' so, we have to be 'genuine'?? ha....
Originally posted by sacredspirits:b'cos u sound 'sincere' so, we have to be 'genuine'?? ha....
I'm marrying a bloke! I don't want to compete for closet space and bathroom countertop space and wardrobe space with a Metrosexual!Originally posted by alexkusu:didnt the age of metrosex reaches its end? time for the blokes!
Originally posted by alexkusu:metrosex is another word for 'straight gay' isnt it?
Seems like it!Originally posted by alexkusu:metrosex is another word for 'straight gay' isnt it?
Do you know that, there are some here who disguised as a guy or appear to be old women coz they had previous bad experience with their former nicks?Originally posted by Pitot:nan dao..
Ah Lau is a girl?
GDS!! GDS!!
hmmmm ...... can we call the last guy a sanctimonious prude ? ....Originally posted by Rhonda:OK, interesting... here's a new term - Retrosexual, ie. Anti-Metro!!
Again, in Wikipedia :
A retrosexual is a man with a generally poor sense of style -- not necessarily a boor; rather, someone who rejects being finicky about physical appearance. It is the opposite of a metrosexual.
A man who rejects casual sex as mindless and immoral may also be known as a retrosexual.
ooohh, ooh, the second point apply to meOriginally posted by Rhonda:OK, interesting... here's a new term - Retrosexual, ie. Anti-Metro!!
Again, in Wikipedia :
A retrosexual is a man with a generally poor sense of style -- not necessarily a boor; rather, someone who rejects being finicky about physical appearance. It is the opposite of a metrosexual.
A man who rejects casual sex as mindless and immoral may also be known as a retrosexual.
Haiz... why do you need to take them seriously?Originally posted by laurence82:Do you know that, there are some here who disguised as a guy or appear to be old women coz they had previous bad experience with their former nicks?
wah!.... any 'retrosexual' here then??Originally posted by Rhonda:OK, interesting... here's a new term - Retrosexual, ie. Anti-Metro!!
Again, in Wikipedia :
A retrosexual is a man with a generally poor sense of style -- not necessarily a boor; rather, someone who rejects being finicky about physical appearance. It is the opposite of a metrosexual.
A man who rejects casual sex as mindless and immoral may also be known as a retrosexual.
i know.. so now.. ur saying ur a gal in disguise?Originally posted by laurence82:Do you know that, there are some here who disguised as a guy or appear to be old women coz they had previous bad experience with their former nicks?
Hmm... in that case, I shall say that I'm inclined towards the sanctimonious prudes!Originally posted by Fatum:hmmmm ...... can we call the last guy a sanctimonious prude ? ....
Originally posted by Pitot:i know.. so now.. ur saying ur a gal in disguise?
hmm..... rhonda, r u lonesome tonight?Originally posted by Rhonda:Know of any who are ripe for the plucking?!
In that case, he's a Metrosexual, cause to be a Metrosexual, they don't care if you have casual sex or not. In fact, you can be of ANY sexual orientation and what-not and still be a Metrosexual.Originally posted by sacredspirits:wah!.... any 'retrosexual' here then??
can a man b 'concerned' abt his style and presentation but yet also rejects casual sex??
possible..Originally posted by Rhonda:
Hmm... we've seen Lau in outings before. If he's a girl in disguise, then wah piangz... he's an extremely tomboyish and 'masculine' girl!!
Nope... but I'm ever-ready for some action!!Originally posted by sacredspirits:hmm..... rhonda, r u lonesome tonight?
....Originally posted by Rhonda:Nope... but I'm ever-ready for some action!!