yeps. i also had such teacher who said this to me ,Originally posted by browniebaobao:I retake my O level but still failed..
I think it was bcos I was very demoralised by my darn sec 1 teacher who always chose me to solve maths problem.. and if I failed to solve, I had to remain standing for the whole period. Also, my sec 4 E Maths teacher then.. whenever he sees me, he will mock and me and say "xxxxxx, u are a born failure!". All the humiliation and emabrrassment..
I dropped A Maths, bcos I wanted to concentrate on E Maths.. but I made the wrong move..
I got D7, no matter how hard i tried.
but I dun have much problem doing accounting and business statistics..
i think it's that darn teacher I had that really killed my interest for Maths.
Actually I find this linguistic problem a much more.. recent issue. My time.. .... it was a lot more straightforward. But when I used to tutor P2 kids, wow.. their maths questions now are a lot more difficult.. and many could not understand the questions because of the way they were phrased and because their English is not good enough.Originally posted by Herzog_Zwei:You forgot the linguistic presentation of the problem. English is a very tricky language.
The teachers that really piss me off are those who think reverse psychology works. It only works if you give a damn.... and if you give a damn.. you won't be bad in it in the first place.Originally posted by lalala1999:yeps. i also had such teacher who said this to me ,
" i see you this kind , should be cannot go into poly with such a grade".
totally dampened my confidence. >.<
What's scary for me now is that I have to learn a bit of history to understand maths.Originally posted by ShrodingersCat:Perhaps what you are talking about is that Maths is really a Cognitive subject and not simply about NUMBERS. And yes, I agree.
What i LIKE about maths later in life is..... how maths is everywhere.. (but we don't see that earlier on) and I guess with the more modern cross discipline approach to education there is a lot more opportunity for this... i.e. I read this book about how nature is governed by mathematical laws of symmetry and etc, music and mathematics, and... late in University, my tutor spoke about maths and ART... such diverse manifestations of a subject i used to fear...
Explain?Originally posted by CoolMyth:What's scary for me now is that I have to learn a bit of history to understand maths.
Basically, reading about how this theorem and this theorem came about, what motivation lies behind in deriving this theorem and how the theorem was used initally.Originally posted by ShrodingersCat:Explain?
History is fun ma.. if you disregard the memorising of the dates (which is really about perspective, placing and time line) ... its... stories stories...
Originally posted by ShrodingersCat:Explain?
History is fun ma.. if you disregard the memorising of the dates (which is really about perspective, placing and time line) ... its... stories stories...
yeah! I would think that would make maths a lot more interesting leh.... heee like when I was reading Fermat's Theorem.. can't say I understand the theorem but its interesting to read how people are so affected by it, makes you intrigued to want to know more about it.Originally posted by CoolMyth:Basically, reading about how this theorem and this theorem came about, what motivation lies behind in deriving this theorem and how the theorem was used initally.
And also, the general response by the mathematical circle as to the usage of this theorem etc etc.
The idea is to provide a motivation for learning what I'm learning now.
Originally posted by ShrodingersCat:yeah! I would think that would make maths a lot more interesting leh.... heee like when I was reading Fermat's Theorem.. can't say I understand the theorem but its interesting to read how people are so affected by it, makes you intrigued to want to know more about it.
Ya that's the book I readOriginally posted by the Bear:ahhh.. the greatest ever problem..
so simple, yet so confounding...
x^n = y^n + z^n
cannot exist for n, x, y, z = integers and n>2
they could not prove that for 350 years until Andrew Wiles did about 10 years ago...
i highly recommend the book by Simon Singh.. it has been retitled Fermat's Enigma now.. it was called Fermat's Last Theorem...
very very wonderful read
Originally posted by ShrodingersCat:Ya that's the book I read
I like Simon Singh's books.
hw did u get to offer A maths if yr maths at sec 2 was poorOriginally posted by browniebaobao:I retake my O level but still failed..
I think it was bcos I was very demoralised by my darn sec 1 teacher who always chose me to solve maths problem.. and if I failed to solve, I had to remain standing for the whole period. Also, my sec 4 E Maths teacher then.. whenever he sees me, he will mock and me and say "xxxxxx, u are a born failure!". All the humiliation and emabrrassment..
I dropped A Maths, bcos I wanted to concentrate on E Maths.. but I made the wrong move..
I got D7, no matter how hard i tried.
but I dun have much problem doing accounting and business statistics..
i think it's that darn teacher I had that really killed my interest for Maths.
Yeah and scientists for that matter... like the love life of Einstein...Originally posted by the Bear:ahh.. then you'll know all about the colourful histories of mathematicians..
they're all not stodgy and dusty people bent over dark corners of universities
Sad to say... ya. (I dont seem to have many very good teachers I'm afraid, though I do remember a couple with great affection and respect)Originally posted by the Bear:history is badly tackled at schools...
all Express students were given the option to do either A Maths or POA.Originally posted by Chelzea:hw did u get to offer A maths if yr maths at sec 2 was poor