CPF Payout At The Age of 80?!!
-
You all must look beyond your personal gains. For the greater good and well being of future singaporeans and the future of Singapore!Your sons and grandsons... and grand sons grandsons. Believe in your government! Know that the few sacrifice for the many! Will you be the ones that will start the change , to look beyond your current situations , courageously braving the hail storm that is to come! Do you not have enough food. Do you not have a roof over your heads. Do you not have security !
Every master plan comes with a cost. Sacrifices have to be made , if not now then when ? When your economies are destroyed ? When you have lost the edge in competition ?
Let this message be broadcast to every channel , heard in every news , in every newspaper and show you all why you need us ! 'The government'
Citizens.. please!
-
Originally posted by the Bear:
i was looking at Lim Siah Sway trying to convince people in the papers..
65.. uhh.. from when?
2030?
cek ah.. mee pok kwee luie?
mee pok chit wa gor pah kor...
2013, not 2030. that means 5 years later... hmm... i will be how old *start to count* -
Originally posted by BadzMaro:
You all must look beyond your personal gains. For the greater good and well being of future singaporeans and the future of Singapore!Your sons and grandsons... and grand sons grandsons. Believe in your government! Know that the few sacrifice for the many! Will you be the ones that will start the change , to look beyond your current situations , courageously braving the hail storm that is to come! Do you not have enough food. Do you not have a roof over your heads. Do you not have security !
Every master plan comes with a cost. Sacrifices have to be made , if not now then when ? When your economies are destroyed ? When you have lost the edge in competition ?
Let this message be broadcast to every channel , heard in every news , in every newspaper and show you all why you need us ! 'The government'
Citizens.. please!
for this thing to be self sustaining, the inputs have to be larger than the outputs, of course ... that is to say .... other than the one or two octogenarians among us, this scheme is a loosing proposition ... I may be insinuating something here, but just think of the utility of such a massive and ever growing pool of liquidity for the powers that be ! .... and based on the powers-that-be's track record on other massive funds, like the goverment investment funds and the monetary reserves, I'd say, there'll never be a time when the fund is "safe and self sustaining" ....
this is the crux of the opposition to this scheme ..... and also, why should we be forcibily asked to take part in such a scheme, to be told how to spend our money ? ... this liquidity can be a big crimp on our life style, on our life choices ... that amount of money we put in could have been invested into a retirement business, a franchise for example ... to be invested in a child's education, an off spring's business venture, to buy a property overseas in a cheaper place, with lower cost of living .... etc etc ....
this is totally ridiculous, we talk of moving away from the nanny state .. now we're being told where to put our money and what to do with it ... even the money that we earn is not all ours any more .....
I really hope my constituency won't be a walk over again .... I am looking forward to exercising my political rights ...