What a waste!
-
The whole time I was reading this story, I was going tsk, tsk, tsk...
Mazda out to destroy $100 million worth of new cars
April 30, 2008
PORTLAND, Ore. – “Fire in the hole!” shouts Ron Hoodenpyle, covering his ears and stepping away from a brand-new Mazda 3 he just wired with special detonators. Suddenly, all six of the car's airbags explode at once.
Within hours the metallic blue sedan will be drained, gutted, squished and shredded – one of thousands to meet the same fate here. The cars are so new, most don't even have 10 miles on the odometer.
Auto makers usually try to find the best way to build new vehicles. These days, Mazda Motor Corp. is busy figuring out how to most efficiently destroy them.
It all started about two years ago, when a ship carrying 4,703 shiny new Mazdas nearly sank in the Pacific. The freighter, the Cougar Ace, spent weeks bobbing on the high seas, listing at a severe 60-degree angle, before finally being righted.
The mishap created a dilemma: What to do with the cars? They had remained safely strapped down throughout the ordeal – but no one knew for sure what damage, if any, might be caused by dangling cars at such a steep angle for so long. Might corrosive fluids seep into chambers where they don't belong? Was the Cougar Ace now full of lemons?
The Japanese car maker, controlled by Ford Motor Corp., easily could have found takers for the vehicles. Hundreds of people called about buying cheap Mazdas. Schools wanted them for auto-shop courses.Mazda turned everyone away. It worried about getting sued someday if, say, an air-bag failed to fire properly due to overexposure to salty sea air.
It also worried that scammers might find a way to spirit the cars abroad to sell as new. That happened to thousands of so-called “Katrina cars” salvaged from New Orleans' flooding three years ago. Those cars – their electronics gone haywire and sand in the engines – were given a paint job and unloaded in Latin America on unsuspecting buyers, damaging auto makers' reputations.
Mazda saw no easy way to guard against these outcomes. So it decided to destroy approximately $100 million worth of factory-new automobiles.
It turns out that wrecking cars isn't a simple matter. “We had to create a disassembly line, basically,” says Bob Turbett, the Mazda executive overseeing the destruction process.
It took more than a year to devise a plan that satisfied everyone. The city of Portland wanted assurance that nearly 5,000 cars' worth of antifreeze, brake fluid and other hazardous goop wasn't mishandled. Insurers covering Mazda's losses wanted to be sure the company wouldn't resell any cars or parts – thereby profiting on the side. So every steel-alloy wheel has to be sliced, every battery rendered inoperable, and every tire damaged beyond repair. All CD players must get smashed.
Little things make a big difference. For instance, most of the cars have six airbags, and discharging them individually ( forcing them to inflate so they can't be resold) takes about five minutes apiece – or a total of a half-hour per car. So engineers back at Mazda's headquarters, in Hiroshima, fashioned a device that can discharge all six at once. Multiplied by 4,703 cars, that trick alone saved months of work.
Mazda declined to put a price tag on the demolition, which was covered by insurance. The company says all its insurance claims have been settled.
The process runs with startling efficiency. It begins when longshoremen take the cars from the freighter and drive them to a nearby lot where the airbags get destroyed by men like Hoodenpyle.
On a recent day, dressed in a white jumpsuit and wearing goggles, he twiddled a few knobs on his special airbag detonator, and pushed a button. The staccato pop-pop-pop of exploding bags sounded like the muffled gunshots of a wise-guy assassination in a gangster film.
A forklift next piles the cars onto trailers for a brief ride to Pacific Car Crushing. There it takes about 45 minutes to prepare each Mazda for flattening. Steel-alloy wheels are sliced with high-power saws to make sure they won't be resold. Holes are drilled into every tire.
The cars get placed into a crusher that applies 25,000 pounds per square inch of pressure, flattening them into colorful slabs.
Next stop: Schnitzer Steel, a salvage yard down on the waterfront that's home to an immense metal grinder.
Moments later, metal shards – most no bigger than an ashtray – sprinkle onto a mountain of scrap near Schnitzer's dock. There, a freighter prepares to take the scrap back to Asia where it will get recycled.
Wilson looks on and concludes: “It'll all probably end up coming back as cars.”
-
No choice, I guess. They can't afford to take the risk of the car being unsafe on the road.
-
It's a by-product of the litigious society that we've become, where everyone wants to avoid or shirk responsibility like the plague. At least some of the scrap is getting recycled.
-
why not give them to the military as targets ?.....
i'm sure some leathernecks would love to blow a mazda up with an AT4 ...
-
Originally posted by Fatum:
why not give them to the military as targets ?.....
i'm sure some leathernecks would love to blow a mazda up with an AT4 ...
Well, they might be sued if flying shrapnel hits and injures someone.
And KB is so right... our society has become too litigious.
-
Originally posted by Rhonda:
Well, they might be sued if flying shrapnel hits and injures someone.
And KB is so right... our society has become too litigious.
That's coz they watch too much American TV dramas
And if you see those stupid cases we have, it's always about 'Their rights' but they promptly forgot about the rights of others.... which basically boils down to the stupid human rights issue without I think it's a load of BS
-
Originally posted by elindra:
That's coz they watch too much American TV dramasAnd if you see those stupid cases we have, it's always about 'Their rights' but they promptly forgot about the rights of others.... which basically boils down to the stupid human rights issue without I think it's a load of BS
Just goes to show how selfish society has become. Everyone's interested in preserving their own rights, to hell with the rights of others.
The neighbour who blasts his/her music out loud is thinking, "I have a right to enjoy my music in my house, to hell if I disturb the peace of others in the process!"
The unemployed bum thinks, "It's my right as an Aussie to claim Centrelink Benefits for not being able to find a job that pays well, to hell with the taxpayers who have to work hard and pay hefty taxes to fund my sloth!"
etc etc.
-
I wonder who made the decision to do that. A very darling one I must say.
-
-no advertising-