I WAS surprised and relieved to see the article on Sunday ('Is your child's tutor qualified?').
I am the chief executive officer of the Australian Tutoring Association (ATA) and last year, while in Singapore, I met two large tuition companies here to speak about issues that the tuition industry could address.
These issues included:
Both businesses expressed interest in forming an association similar to the ATA. However, neither has acted despite both recognising serious issues in the industry.
In Australia, the ATA has given consumers a choice between those places offering accountable, honest and open tuition, and those that do not.
We do this by having members agree to abide by our code of conduct, which is available online to consumers and to which all members are accountable.
Why isn't there a tuition association in Singapore which benchmarks minimum standards for all tutors?
Why is the industry unregulated?
Who is most vulnerable?
A responsible industry has a representative body. It seems odd that in Singapore, where there is a real focus on education, the private sector is not called upon to demonstrate more initiative with regard to consumers.
The worst aspects of the sector in Australia are similar to those that occur here: Online tuition and the use of agents (in the case of tuition agencies that are not registered with the Ministry of Education).
I think serious questions should be asked about the tuition sector in Singapore, and all related businesses should be subject to greater consumer scrutiny until there is a representative body that is prepared to publicly call for minimum standards and work with the Government as well as consumer protection and educational bodies.
Mohan Dhall
so Singaporean tutors are unqualified tutors??
I REFER to last Thursday's letter by Mr Mohan Dhall ("Tuition industry lacks regulation").
Regulation does not come free. It involves a lot of time, hassle and money. These costs would eventually pass down to consumers. The tuition industry has created lots of part-time jobs for many, including students.
Secondary school students can easily differentiate between a good and a bad tutor with one lesson. Hence, they can choose to discontinue the tuition, if they find the quality not as expected. The loss is minimal.
Parents of young pupils can monitor the progress of the tuition closely and similarly choose to discontinue at any point.
Parents and students can also request for information or ask as many questions as they wish before hiring a tutor or registering for lessons. Some tutors have websites which explain and elaborate in detail about themselves and their lessons.
The costs versus benefits of regulation should be carefully weighed.
Kam Suet Cheng (Mdm)