Home > Homework Forum

::Homework Crapbox:: (version 2013 & 2014 & 2015 & 2016)

  • UltimaOnline
    Killer NSF targeted slim, young women with long hair and wearing short skirts
    Posted on 21 August 2013  |  6771 views  |  3 comments  |  0 shares
    PHOTO: THE STRAITS TIMES, WANBAO
    A full-time national serviceman who knifed four women in a span of nine months in the northern part of Singapore in 2010, killing one of them, was convicted in the High Court on Tuesday.
     
    Soh Wee Kian, 23, pleaded guilty to one count of culpable homicide for killing mother of two Hoe Hong Lin, 32, in Woodlands, as well as one count of causing grievous hurt with a weapon for stabbing Ms How Poh Ling, 28, in Sembawang.
     
    The court heard that Soh would wander around HDB blocks, with a glove and a knife in his pockets, looking for women with long hair and wearing short skirts.

    He would follow them and fantasise about stabbing them in the back and touching their breasts and kissing them, reports The Straits Times/

     
    Soh originally faced a murder charge for Madam Hoe's killing but escaped the gallows after his lawyers made written representations to the prosecution to reduce the charge to culpable homicide.

    He is expected to be sentenced on Thursday and faces either life imprisonment and caning, or up to 20 years' jail and a fine or caning.

    Two other charges, for slashing Ms Ooi Li Li and Ms Lam Hui Lin, will be taken into consideration during sentencing

  • UltimaOnline

    India has thousands of billionaires, and it took a European group to raise funds to save this little Indian girl?

    http://news.insing.com/tabloid/baby-with-swollen-head-discharged-from-indian-hospital/id-98783f00

  • UltimaOnline

    LittleRedDot posted : "Why are Singapore pastors so hip-looking?"

    FCBC Singapore

    NCC Singapore

    CHC Singapore

    -------------------------------------------

    LooneyTan then posted the following :

    LE Singapore : "I hip-looking meh?"

     

  • UltimaOnline
    Sexual harassment in India: 'The story you never wanted to hear'
    By Daphne Sashin and Katie Hawkins-Gaar, CNN
    August 20, 2013 -- Updated 1824 GMT (0224 HKT)


    Michaela Cross shared her experiences of repeated sexual harassment while studying abroad in India.

    (CNN) -- Michaela Cross, an American student at the University of Chicago, has written a powerful account of her study abroad trip to India last year, during which she says she experienced relentless sexual harassment, groping and worse.

    Upon her return, she says she was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and is now on a mental leave of absence from the school after a public breakdown in the spring.

    Cross, a fair-skinned, red-haired South Asian studies major, titled her story "India: The Story You Never Wanted to Hear." She posted her account on CNN iReport under the username RoseChasm.


    Her story has struck a chord around the world, racking up about 350,000 page views as of Tuesday morning. It quickly found its way to India, where many readers sympathized with the story and men felt compelled to apologize for the experience she endured. Others called for greater perspective and warned against making generalizations about India or its people.


    India's deadly gang rape of a 23-year-old woman in New Delhi happened a few days after Cross left India in December, and she said that helped others understand what she and her classmates went through. The country has continued to see several high-profile cases of rape and sexual violence cases since then, and the government has introduced tougher laws and punishment for sexual crimes.


    On her return, Cross struggled to find a way to talk about a cultural experience that was both beautiful and traumatizing, she said in her essay.

    She writes:

    "Do I tell them about our first night in the city of Pune, when we danced in the Ganesha festival, and leave it at that? Or do I go on and tell them how the festival actually stopped when the American women started dancing, so that we looked around to see a circle of men filming our every move?

    "Do I tell them about bargaining at the bazaar for beautiful saris costing a few dollars a piece, and not mention the men who stood watching us, who would push by us, clawing at our breasts and groins?


    "When people compliment me on my Indian sandals, do I talk about the man who stalked me for 45 minutes after I purchased them, until I yelled in his face in a busy crowd?"


    Later, she writes: "For three months I lived this way, in a traveler's heaven and a woman's hell. I was stalked, groped, masturbated at; and yet I had adventures beyond my imagination. I hoped that my nightmare would end at the tarmac, but that was just the beginning."


    A university spokesman confirmed Cross is a student at the school and would not comment on her mental leave. He said the school is committed to students' safety at home and abroad.


    Cross said she didn't say anything to the professors on the trip until things reached "a boiling point" -- what she called two rape attempts in 48 hours.


    Dipesh Chakrabarty, a University of Chicago professor who was in India for the first three weeks of the session, told CNN that he was unaware of Cross' situation. He noted, though, that the university tries to prepare students for what they might encounter while abroad. The Civilizations Abroad in India program was based in the city of Pune, but the students traveled to other areas during the semester.

    "Both faculty and staff in Chicago and our local Indian staff counsel students before and during the trip about precautions they need to take in a place like India," Chakrabarty said in an e-mail. "Ensuring student safety and well-being is the top priority of both the College and staff and faculty associated with the program."


    The university provided this statement to CNN:

    "Nothing is more important to us at the University of Chicago than caring for the safety and well-being of our students, here in Chicago and wherever they go around the world in the course of their studies. The University offers extensive support and advice to students before, during and after their trips abroad, and we are constantly assessing and updating that preparation in light of events and our students' experiences. We also place extremely high value on the knowledge our students seek by traveling and studying other civilizations and cultures, and we are committed to ensuring they can do so in safety while enriching their intellectual lives."
    Her story sparked a wave of reaction online, with scores of Indians responding, many with sympathy to her plight and pointing out that Indian women also experience high levels of harassment and abuse.

    Arvind Rao, a media professional in Mumbai, was moved to post this comment on her story: "It thoroughly disgusts me to be known as an Indian male ... An apology is extremely meager for all the trauma you've gone through." He expressed hope that politicians would "wake up and implement stricter laws against crime and sexual harassment on women."


    "Every time my girlfriend goes out alone, I pray that she comes back home safely," wrote a commenter using the name Jajabar. "Being an Indian male, I apologize."

    Others, however, observed that sexual harassment was by no means confined to India, and Indian commenter Sam1967 warned against condemning his home country when so many others failed to protect the women living within their borders.

    "I accept what happened was definitely an embarrassment and a cause of trauma for her that might haunt her for the rest of her life. But this has happened in many other countries or places and therefore it may not be the right thing to single out India."

    Another woman who said she was on the same University of Chicago sponsored trip to India, posted a response on CNN iReport calling on people to resist stereotyping Indian men and recognize that sexual assault happens all over the world.

    The student, Katherine Stewart, said she dealt with her own share of harassment on the trip, but "in my experiences in India, I have met a solid handful of warm and honest Indian men -- men who are also college students, men who also love the thrill of riding on a motorcycle in the busy streets, men who defended me at necessary times, and men who took the time to get to know me and my culture. And that should not at all be surprising."


    Stewart said she believed Cross "had every right to tell her story" and in no way wanted to lessen the significance of her experience. But Stewart, who is black, cautioned that "when we do not make the distinction that only some men of a population commit a crime, we develop a stereotype for an entire population. And when we develop a negative stereotype for a population, what arises? Racism."


    One thing is certain: Cross sparked a huge discussion with a story that she thought no one wanted to hear. She said she is thankful for her experiences in India, and wants to see more international exposure about what women travelers and residents endure.


    "Truth is a gift, a burden, and a responsibility. And I mean to share it," she writes. "This is the story you don't want to hear when you ask me about India. But this is the story you need."



    CNN's Sarah Brown contributed to this story.
  • UltimaOnline

    Dear The Real Singapore,

    My husband recently downloaded a new iPhone app called WeChat. It allows you to chat with strangers and I suspect him of using it to talk to strangers. I read from a forum that WeChat is a popular place for China students studying in Singapore to sell their body for money. Whenever I tried to take a look at his phone he will act very aggressively and snatch it back from me. Once, I caught him talking to a girl called Anna who types in mandarin, I suspect she is a PRC girl student working illegally in Singapore. Now, he even set a new password on his iPhone and I am unable to access his phone anymore. When i ask him what is the reason for setting a new password he will shout back at me saying "Why you so busybody!". Am I too paranoid?

    We are a newly wed couple in our late 20s and he goes clubbing with his work and army friends all the time. I am afraid of him picking up random China girls on WeChat for sex. Sometimes he come home drunk and one day I even found a pack of condoms in his briefcase. We never had sex using condoms since he doesn't like it. I am not a very smart person and I graduated only from ITE and he is a university graduate from SIM. Sometimes I feel that the only reason we got married is because I got pregnant and gave birth to our baby. I hope to remain anonymous and I hope to read some of the advices given by your readers.



  • UltimaOnline

    [Britain] - A metal spoon against forced marriages

    An ingenius tactic involving a metal spoon, kudos to the person who thought of it. No girl should be forced into sexual slavery against her will.
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/15/women-forced-marriage-spoon-underwear

  • UltimaOnline

    CPE-MOE-SgGovt versus Singaporean-HanHuiHui
    http://yoursdp.org/publ/perspectives/2-1-0-1350

     

  • UltimaOnline
  • UltimaOnline
  • UltimaOnline
  • UltimaOnline

    [China] - Policemen watch on as teen girl stabbed to death

    It appears the policemen were themselves afraid of getting hurt by the knife wielding perpetrator, and only watched from a safe distance as the teenage girl (who was working in the store) was stabbed to death.

    In fact, the 2 policemen took action to apprehend the perpetrator, only *after* the perpetrator (somehow) accidentally stabbed himself twice and fell to the ground.

    Video :
    http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg/singaporeseen/this-urban-jungle/police-in-china-look-on-as-girl-is-stabbed-to-death-2-metres-away

  • M the name

    5 Ways to Lower Back to School Stress in 5 Minutes or Less : http://noahstjohn.com/blog/5-ways-to-lower-back-to-school-stress-in-5-minutes-or-less

  • UltimaOnline
  • UltimaOnline

    RJC Yr 1 student aims to succeed on her own completely without tuition, and do well enough to qualify for a University scholarship. She admits she sometimes feels the struggle to catch up with her peers in JC, almost all of whom have multiple tuitions.

    http://www.channelnewsasia.com/tv/tvshows/new_document/it-figures-outliers/786530.html

  • UltimaOnline

    What's notable, is the number of thumbs up vs thumbs down for this video.

    Miley Cyrus' performance :
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_eeFb8skrV0

  • UltimaOnline
  • UltimaOnline

    http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/harrassed-out-of-school-more-non-muslim-students-leaving-sk-seri-pristana

    Malaysia - Harassed out of school - more non-Muslim students leaving




    At least three non-Muslim pupils have left SK Seri Pristana in Sungai Buloh and 10 others are to follow - the result of alleged intimidation following the shower room incident.

    The three who left earlier claimed they were intimidated and bullied by school authorities after the issue of non-Muslim pupils being ordered to have their recess in the school's shower room surfaced.

    At a Press conference today, it was revealed that the parents of 10 other non-Muslim pupils will be transfering their children out of the school following the arrest of a parent for allegedly intimidating the headmaster.

    Non-governmental organisation Malaysia Tamilan Today Welfare Association national secretary K. Gunasegaran said these parents have lost all faith in the school's headmaster and teachers.

    "We don't see any other way as these pupils are being harassed and bullied in the school, just because their parents spoke up," he said.

    There are 25 non-Muslim pupils among the 1,400 enrolled at the school.

    Seri Pristana was at the centre of controversy last month after a parent, Guneswari Kelly, uploaded a picture of non-Muslim pupils eating in the shower room. It was said that the directive to the students came from the headmaster.

    The picture went viral and created an uproar among the public.

    Even though the controversy was resolved - the school canteen was reopened for the students' use - things did not get back to normal for Guneswari's daughter. She was reportedly intimidated and bullied by both teachers and students. Eventually, Guneswari transferred her daughter to a Tamil school.

    At least 10 parents have lodged reports against the school on similar charges of intimidation and bullying but police have said that there was no criminal intent and the matter was transferred to the Education Department.

    In a twist of events yesterday, a parent, V. Kumancan, was arrested for allegedly threatening headmaster Mohd Nasir Mohd Noor.

    He had allegedly gone to the school on July 25 at 2.30pm but Kumancan denied the accusation, saying he was working at the time.

    However, Gunasegaran revealed that Kumancan's boss told police that the latter had not been to work for two weeks around the date in question.

    The 31-year-old was later released on police bail but is expected to be charged with criminal intimidation soon.

    Kumancan himself lodged a report on July 30 against Mohd Nasir and the school for allegedly taking photographs of his 10-year-old daughter in school.

    He alleged it happened twice on July 29, four days after shower room incident.

    Last Friday, a policeman went to Kumancan's mother-in-law's home around midnight and caused a "commotion", according to Gunasegaran.

    The next day Gunasegaran advised the "terrified" Kumancan to lodge a report against the cop, and he was told then to return on Monday to give a statement.

    When he arrived yesterday, he was arrested and put him in an identification line-up where he was picked out by two teachers from the school.

    Gunasegaran, reading out a statement by the parents, said Kumancan's case was worrying. ""So, we don't believe the school is the right place for our children to study."

    Kumancan, who was present, confirmed that his daughter would be moved too.

    "Which parent would not be alarmed when they hear strange people taking pictures of their children in school?" he said.

    Another parent, who only wanted to be known as Raj, had successfully transferred his traumatized 10-year-old daughter to another school.

    "She was bullied mercilessly and begged me not to send her to that school," he added.


    Raj and Kumancan were one of the 10 parents who had lodged a report against Mohd Nasir last month.

    Meanwhile, Subang Member of Parliament R. Sivarasa said that the matter had escalated from a principal's mistake to allegations of police abusing their powers.

    "This matter cannot be solved in the district level. I will bring this to Bukit Aman," he promised.

    He also called on the BN government, especially the Home Minister and the Education Minister, to act quickly to defuse the tension.

    "A responsible government will immediately resolve this issue instead of letting it get out of hand." - August 27, 2013.

  • UltimaOnline

    Chinese boy, 6, has eyes gouged out in gruesome attack



    The boy lies on his hospital bed with his eyes covered with bandages in a hospital in Taiyuan, north China's Shanxi province on Tuesday, Aug 27, 2013.
    AFP
    Tuesday, Aug 27, 2013

    BEIJING - A six-year-old boy in China had his eyes gouged out, blinding him for life, reports said on Tuesday, in a gruesome attack that may have been carried out by a ruthless organ trafficker.

    Family members found the boy covered in blood some three to four hours after he went missing while playing outside, according to a television report posted online.

    The child's eyes were found nearby but the corneas were missing, reports said, implying that an organ trafficker was behind the harrowing attack.

    Police offered a 100,000 yuan (S$21,000) reward for information leading to the arrest of the sole suspect, who they said was a woman.

    "He had blood all over his face. His eyelids were turned inside out. And inside, his eyeballs were not there," his father told Shanxi Television.

    Its report showed the heavily-bandaged boy being taken from an operating theatre and placed in a hospital bed, writhing in agony as family members stood at his bedside weeping.

    The boy was drugged and "lost consciousness" before the attacker removed his eyes, state broadcaster China Central Television (CCTV) said on its account on Sina Weibo, China's version of Twitter.

    Internet users were outraged by the attack on the boy - who had a cleft palate - in Fenxi, in the northern province of Shanxi on Monday.

    "This is extraordinarily vicious," said one Sina Weibo user. "How and why could someone be so cruel?" "A truly tragic boy," said another poster.

    About 300,000 patients in China need transplants each year, but only about 10,000 people can get them due to a lack of donors, state media said.

    Seven people were jailed last year when a teenager sold a kidney for an illicit transplant operation and used the proceeds to buy an iPhone and iPad.

    Child organs are usually more expensive on the black market, an organ trafficker told Sina Internet news portal in 2010, as "most people think the younger the donor is, the better the quality of organs".
  • UltimaOnline
  • UltimaOnline

    http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.sg/

    Medishield Life front load is another con job

    August 28th, 2013 | Author: Contributions


    Intro -

    One of the suggestions to address the problem of affordability in the
    proposed Medishield Life is to have front loading. What this means is that the
    person insured pays a higher premium when he is young and healthy. This sounds
    good on the surface. But due to the fact that the Medishield Life is forced scheme, the question of ethics
    and fair play, or rather should I say non-ethics and non-fair play, come into
    the picture.

    What this article is about -

    This article argues why it is highly not ethical to front load policies in
    the Medishield Life. The main reason being that first and foremost, it is a
    forced scheme. This being the case, any term that is imposed on the policyholder
    if he finds unfavourable, cannot be rejected. Secondly, front loading means you
    pay for the company’s cost upfront, and that too may be a loaded policy that may
    not be favourable to you, which you can’t reject.

    The whys of front loading according to Dr Lam Pin Min -

    Dr
    Lam Pin Min: “Front-load healthcare premiums, but…”




    Q: There’s going to be public consultation for
    MediShield Life. What are the challenges?


    One is that of the affordability of the premium. How much increase is fair
    and manageable for the majority of Singaporeans?

    Secondly, how much coverage is necessary and sufficient? You can strengthen
    MediShield to cover very expensive bills, but that will result in significantly
    higher premiums. Like what PM mentioned in the Rally, Ministry of Health has
    combed through all the cases, and those cases where patients incurred really big
    bills and are unable to afford them, are far and few between.

    If the increase is too excessive, low-income and elderly Singaporeans will
    definitely find it difficult to manage.
    One way is to seriously consider Dr
    Amy Khor’s (Minister of State for Health & Manpower) proposal to front-load
    the premium.

    However, we need to explain to Singaporeans the concept and rationale of
    front-loading. Younger working Singaporeans can pay higher premiums so that when
    they grow old and are retired, the premium quantum can be lowered to a more
    manageable level. It’s like front-loading for your own policy in the future.

    …snip

    Q: Risk pooling and front-loading only works if MediShield
    Life has enough young and healthy people. With an ageing society and declining
    fertility, fewer young people will support a fast growing number of elderly.
    Will premiums have to go up by a lot later? Will the scheme be sustainable?

    I see front-loading as a way of funding one’s healthcare needs for the
    future. By paying higher premium when we are young, it allows the premium to be
    lowered when we reach retirement age.
    The challenge lies in the current
    pioneer generation whose Medisave savings may be inadequate to pay for their
    current MediShield premium. The Pioneer Generation Package comes in
    handy.
    Let us take a look at why front loading is unethical -

    IMO, front loading is highly unethical. What it does is that it transfers the
    risk of the company back to the policyholder. Hey, isn’t the purpose of
    insurance for the company to take the risk from the policyholder in the first
    place? Why then transfer the risk back to the policyholder right after agreeing
    to take the policyholder’s risk?


    Below are my arguments to support my case:

    1. Insurer’s costs are highest at the start of the policy
    -

    For almost every insurance policy the company issues, the cost at the initial
    stages is at its highest. That’s because besides all the admin and underwriting
    procedures, the company also has to pay commissions to its agents. As time goes
    by, when the premiums get paid over the years, the company will start to make
    profits. The biggest risk is when the policyholder makes a claim after just a
    few premium payments. Hence, it is an accepted fact and an industrial norm for
    insurance companies to bear the high risk of any insurance policy at the initial
    stages.

    With the above in mind, front loading actually transfers the risk of the
    insurer to the policyholder. By
    charging a higher premium earlier, the company reduces its own risk in the
    inital stages substantially, and transfers that risk to the insured
    instead
    . This is the gist of front loading. All the crap talk that “it
    would make it more affordable” as you grow old, is just talk to appease the
    public. By hiding the whole truth on front loading, isn’t this unethical?


    2. No option to reject unfavourable terms -

    On top of front loading, a person with pre-existing illnesses will be further
    loaded with either a higher premium than an unloaded case, or have terms of
    exclusion, or both. But what if the terms are unfavourable? The person has no
    option to reject. Hence he is now double penalised through no fault of his own.
    First, the loading on his premium due to his pre-existing illness, and secondly,
    the front loading.


    It must be remembered that a person with a pre-existing illness runs a higher
    risk of hospitalisation. That is why insurance companies load him in the first
    place. Hence, high initial cost of the company is already taken into account
    when his premium is loaded. With a further front loading, the company now
    transfers even more risk from itself back to the customer.

    As cited in #1 above, doesn’t this expose the non-ethics of front
    loading?

    3. It is against the principle of risk transfer -

    The purpose of any insurance policy is one of risk transfer. It transfers the
    risk of the policyholder to the insurer. It doesn’t matter what insurance plan.
    It could be life insurance, health, education, hospitalisation insurance. Even
    motor or fire insurance. The purpose is always to transfer the risk from
    policyholder to insurer. This is the core essential practice of insurance.


    We have also seen that the highest risk and cost to the insurer is at the
    initial stages after the policy is issued. To the company, the highest cost and
    risk is when a claim is made just after one premium payment. In terms of
    figures, the policyholder pays just one premium payment which is $x, while the
    company is expected to make a payout of perhaps $1,000x or even $100,000x
    dollars.

    The above risk is part and parcel of the insurance industry. By front
    loading, the company takes a shorter time to recover its costs, which means that
    it is transferring part of its risk back to the insured. And because this is a
    compulsory plan, you cannot reject this unfavourable term. So why must the
    insured take part of the insurer’s risk when an insurance policy is supposed to
    mean the insurer is the one who should taking the risk? Are you not
    shortchanged?


    This is like paying for a 10-day travel insurance when you decide to fly to
    another country. Then one of the terms of the policy is that this 10-day
    insurance will not cover claims for flight related incidents on the first and
    last two days of 10-day insurance plan. But they will double your claim for
    flight related incidents on the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th days. What
    nonsense! Isn’t the risk of flight accidents highest during the first and last
    two days of your holiday, when you need to make that flight? And the company now
    wants to skirt that risk and place it in the lower risk time period?

    The above is no different from the front loading plan where the high risk and
    cost to the company (which is at the beginning of the Medishield Life policy),
    is transferred to its low risk and cost period when you are already above 60,
    after you have made so many premium payments. So it transfers its high risk period back to
    you and will make it up for you during its own low risk period
    . Just like
    the unethical insurance travel policy I cited.


    The diff between my hypothetical travel insurance and Medishield Life is that
    the latter is for real and forced upon you.

    4. What if after front loading, you still can’t pay when you are in
    your 60s and beyond?


    I am surprised to note that the PAPpy guys can’t see the front load scheme is
    a harbinger for a potential future disaster. What if after making front load
    payments for many years, you turn 60 and your funds are now dry? Will you be
    penalised and your hospital bills be left unpaid? In the insurance industry,
    that is standard practice.


    So after you have paid all these years and after you have taken the high risk
    for the company at the early stages, you are left in this difficult position.
    What now? In other words, while you have been bearing the risk at the early
    stages and relieved the company of their high costs, you are now further at risk
    of missing the payouts when you need it most.


    Have the PAP guys who have been promoting the front load scheme thought about
    this?

    Wrapping up and conclusion -

    The front loading is nothing but transferring part of the risk back to the
    insured. This is unethical because the principle of any insurance policy is
    first and foremost, the transfer of risk from the insured to the insurer. By
    front loading, the insured is shortchanged. This is made worse since the
    Medishield Life is compulsory and there is no way anyone can reject the
    unfavourable terms.

    Many insurance policies even out the risk by “smoothening” the payments,
    hence, you get to pay the same amount in premiums from the start to the end of
    the insurance term. Front loading works against this principle too.

    In the end, I feel that Dr Amy Khor and Dr Lim Pin Min are only whitewashing
    the unethical practice of front loading. They are selling to the masses so that
    hopefully, Singaporeans will find it easier to accept this scheme. In reality,
    you are cheated front, back, right, left and centre.

    The insurance companies now are truly laughing all the way to the bank. And
    they’re laughing at Sinkies too, now that they are able to transfer their high
    risk and costs back to the people!

    The front loading scheme is schemed to skim your money while you are still
    young and have the ability to pay. The PAP and the insurance companies know that
    when you are old, you may not be able to pay anymore. But that doesn’t matter.
    They would have already skimmed and milked you dry by then.

    Wasn’t it said that the front loading scheme is to benefit the companies and
    not the people?



    Barrie


    * The writer blogs at http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.com
  • UltimaOnline

  • UltimaOnline
    A group of tourists from a small town in China’s Zhejiang province surprised Singapore Airlines staff when they refused to hand over 30 sets of stainless steel tableware, reported a Chinese daily on Tuesday.

    After a meal provided on board, the Chinese passengers, who were on a tour of Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand, decided to keep the stainless steel knives and forks, said Qianjiang Evening News.

    Even though flight attendants told the tourists the stainless steel tableware were to be re-used, the tourists stubbornly refused to hand them over, saying that relatives who had flown with the airline in the past told them that they could keep the tableware.

    It was only after repeated warnings from a tour guide on the plane that they agreed to hand them over.

    The tour guide reportedly told the tourists that they were hurting China’s image abroad and to “stop hurting the reputation of Chinese people.”

    This incident follows other reports of bad behaviour from Chinese travellers. A Chinese boy carved his name on a 3,000 year old relic during a trip to Egypt recently. Earlier this year, a mainland Chinese mother asked her son to relieve himself in a bottle in the middle of a crowded Hong Kong restaurant.


    http://sg.news.yahoo.com/tourists-on-sia-flight-try-to-keep-30-sets-of-stainless-steel-cutlery-015213972.html